Bush's Shrinking Safety Zone

[TheMercenary]

Originally Posted by tw

You would again turn accurate statements into a pissing contest. classicman, when you do show responsibility and respect for the American soldier. Ask what an intelligent American adult would routinely ask, "When do we go after bin Laden?"

You would instead side with and post like TheMercenary? I thought you were smarter. TheMercenary cannot and therefore does not attempt to defend himself. So why are you his attack dog? Oh. You cannot miss any opportunity to denigrate another? Well, that is the point. Some people, especially George Jr supporters, only understand personal attacks - in Rush Limbaugh tradition.

At what point do you finally demonstrate integrity? Ask what any decent person would ask, "When do we go after bin Laden?" I thought you might be smarter than that. Replies are now in a tone that you understand - personal attack.

Surprise me. Demonstrate a shred of intelligence and integrity. Define George Jr for what he really is. Ask that simple question that George Jr supporters (TheMercenary and UG) fear to ask. Show some respect for the American soldier. Deal with the issues rather than attack another. A simple question that exposes the uneducated (and therefore George Jr supporters) such as TheMercenary.

The game is not old. Now wonder you do it so often. Enjoyable is posting as you and TheMercenary routinely do. You don't like it? Why then would you post like TheMercenary and UG? A socially responsible classicman would instead criticize those who routinely reply with personal attacks. Why do you routinely side with and post like UG and TheMercenary? Are you also a wacko extremist? Its not getting old. Its only confronting extremists with what someone should have done long ago - replies duplicating what they normally do.

No where in this post have you been able to support your claim:

Originally Posted by tw
TheMercenary lied about his service record.

I have more than 20 years of honorable service and the documents to back it up. Your blanket statements dishonor hundreds of thousands of people who have served our nation. Please back up your statement or STFU.

I can't believe the number of other Cellar Dwellers you just sit by and accept this kind of statement from tw.

Thanks to classicman for stepping up to the plate.

[glatt]

Originally Posted by TheMercenary

I can't believe the number of other Cellar Dwellers you just sit by and accept this kind of statement from tw.

I can't speak for anyone else, but this mud fight is not something I'm interested in joining.

I think rich got it right.

Originally Posted by richlevy

All in all, the last dozen posts have a high noise-to-content ratio with a big dose of spin and paranoia from both sides.

[jinx]

As seen on bumper stickers and fridge magnets everywhere:

Never argue with an idiot; people watching may not be able to tell the difference.

[lookout123]

here's the deal Merc. TW has been around since the dawn of the cellar, which coincidentally was the same day his mom got him a laptop. He's always been out in leftfield from what I've seen, although I do wonder what he posted about before 2000. His erratic insanity has become more apparent over the last couple years, but within the last few months he has genuinely blown a circuit I think. The dude is nuts. He isn't worth arguing with. Yeah, I know I do it, but it is for my own entertainment at this point. Don't take anything he says seriously, it's all BS.

I didn't take his bait about your service because it is too ridiculous to argue about. Most guys who lie about their service just do it to make quick points in an argument and then disappear when questions come up. TW is a liar, we all know it, so there really isn't any point in arguing over his obvious lies and insults.

Glatt, I agree with your discomfort about the use of TW's whole name. I think that was a reaction to TW's claim that he knows the truth about other dwellars lives. Not an excuse, but somewhat understandable. Glad to see Classic has chosen to drop that line of attack.

All said and done TW is just a target now. Use him for practice. He has been shown to be a liar. He frequently posts insults but freaks out when someone throws it back at him. (Apparently his mom forgot to teach him that what goes around comes around). When is the last time a dwellar actually read his post without an expectation of insanity? Take it with a grain of salt and a laugh.

[TheMercenary]

Originally Posted by lookout123

here's the deal Merc. TW has been around since the dawn of the cellar, which coincidentally was the same day his mom got him a laptop. He's always been out in leftfield from what I've seen, although I do wonder what he posted about before 2000. His erratic insanity has become more apparent over the last couple years, but within the last few months he has genuinely blown a circuit I think. The dude is nuts. He isn't worth arguing with. Yeah, I know I do it, but it is for my own entertainment at this point. Don't take anything he says seriously, it's all BS.

I didn't take his bait about your service because it is too ridiculous to argue about. Most guys who lie about their service just do it to make quick points in an argument and then disappear when questions come up. TW is a liar, we all know it, so there really isn't any point in arguing over his obvious lies and insults.

Glatt, I agree with your discomfort about the use of TW's whole name. I think that was a reaction to TW's claim that he knows the truth about other dwellars lives. Not an excuse, but somewhat understandable. Glad to see Classic has chosen to drop that line of attack.

All said and done TW is just a target now. Use him for practice. He has been shown to be a liar. He frequently posts insults but freaks out when someone throws it back at him. (Apparently his mom forgot to teach him that what goes around comes around). When is the last time a dwellar actually read his post without an expectation of insanity? Take it with a grain of salt and a laugh.

Good advice. I will just drop it and move on.

[glatt]

Originally Posted by lookout123

Glatt, I agree with your discomfort about the use of TW's whole name. I think that was a reaction to TW's claim that he knows the truth about other dwellars lives.

Absolutely. I think tw was trying to prove some sort of a point by going personal lately. Trying to get some sort of reaction. Maybe play the victim.

[lookout123]

Fuckhim. i don't mind his tinfoil hat, wearing, ridiculous encyclopedic posting, but I'm just tired of the lies, that is why I personally will take every dig at him I can. I don't mind disagreements in factual interpretation, I hate the willful lies and misdirection.

[tw]

Originally Posted by lookout123

I don't mind disagreements in factual interpretation, I hate the willful lies and misdirection.

If you hate lies, then why support the mental midget's political agenda? Funny thing about all those lies from tw. They ended up being truth.

[Urbane Guerrilla]

Originally Posted by glatt

I think tw was trying to prove some sort of a point by going personal lately. Trying to get some sort of reaction. Maybe play the victim.

He's been trying exactly that: he's making these sniveling pleas to Undertoad about how I'm benefiting from a "double standard" that lets me, well, annoy him, without getting banned. I don't know if he's been trying this with anyone else -- I presume I'm just the most obvious example.

Hey, from what I can see I think tw's thinking is typical of the hard Left. Look at the recent MoveOn.org ad against McCain -- it exemplifies the Left's extremity of cowardice, and their utter incapacity in fighting the fascist Ba'athists and other undemocratic, unfree, woman-abusing groups of nasties. Such are our foes, you know. They don't seem much of an improvement over the long-extinct worshippers of Baal with their infant sacrifices. You'd think the Liberal-Left would be against that kind of woman-abusing, but so long as it's a Republican in the Oval Office, nooooo! Seems they want to impeach him for conducting foreign policy while being a Republican, and for trying to win a war started by foreign aggressors by the intelligent strategic approach of leaving them no sanctuary to retreat to. Nuts and crazymen, all of them.

[tw]

Originally Posted by Urbane Guerrilla

Hey, from what I can see I think tw's thinking is typical of the hard Left.

Same UG who openly advocates torture by denying it was torture, then denied it was authorized by those he worships. Senate investigators have traced requests for torture to the highest levels of George Jr administration. These are people that UG admires?

SCOTUS Grants Guantanamo Prisoners Habeas Corpus

... officials began assembling lists of harsh interrogation techniques in the summer of 2002 for use on detainees at Guantanamo Bay and that those officials later cited memos from field commanders to suggest that the proposals originated far down the chain of command,

How does UG reconcile his morality with his love of torture? How does he explain that extremist (like UG) advocated torture in 2002 and then lied about who instituted it in Guantanamo, Abu Ghriad, and in secret torture prisons throughout the world? He doesn't. UG rewrites history.

So who also advocated torture? Who also agrees with UG's versions of morality? Nazis. Religious extremists (Jewish, Christian, and Islamic). N Vietnamese prison guards. African dictators. Papa and Baby Doc Duvailer. Serbian ethnic cleansers such as Milosevik. Saddam. Interesting are those who think just like Urbane Guerrilla.