![]() |
|
|||||||
| Home Base A starting point, and place for threads don't seem to belong anywhere else |
| View Poll Results: read the post first | |||
| 11 |
|
8 | 26.67% |
| 10 |
|
2 | 6.67% |
| 9 |
|
5 | 16.67% |
| 8 |
|
3 | 10.00% |
| 7 |
|
3 | 10.00% |
| 6 |
|
2 | 6.67% |
| 5 |
|
1 | 3.33% |
| 4 |
|
2 | 6.67% |
| 3 |
|
1 | 3.33% |
| 2 |
|
1 | 3.33% |
| 1 |
|
0 | 0% |
| 0 |
|
2 | 6.67% |
| Voters: 30. You may not vote on this poll | |||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#10 |
|
Wearing her bitch boots
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Floriduh
Posts: 1,181
|
I'm going with none. I don't care much for assumptions.
Personally, I don't think that other people have an inferior sense of judgement just because they disagree with me or their perceptions clash with mine. Making a judgement of somone's sense of judgement can't possibly be accurate based on one sample of that ability. I don't know too many people who have never made an error in judgement. If I were to find that all or a majority of the other jurors felt differently than I did, I'd probably review my own opinion to determine if I had any bias or personal perceptions clouding the issue, then either revise or solidify my stance, depending on my introspection.
__________________
"First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they fight you, then you win." - Mahatma Gandhi |
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|