Disney ad for lacy umentionables

[Drax]

Originally Posted by Sundae Girl

Firstly, the underwear isn't lacy.
It's little girl underwear, on a little girl.

Even so, she looks like she's doing kiddie porn, and I fail to believe she agreed to this.

Originally Posted by SG

which I understand is the problem with the picture of the 15 year old (I can't comment as I haven't seen it).

I assume you mean the Miley Cyrus photo. I have seen it. It's not nearly as "bad" as the one in the slate article, but still inappropriate.

[Elspode]

Originally Posted by Drax

I assume you mean the Miley Cyrus photo. I have seen it. It's not nearly as "bad" as the one in the slate article, but still inappropriate.

The Miley Cyrus photo shows about 20 square inches of fifteen year old bare back. I assure you her most modest swimsuit shows far more flesh than does the Liebowitz photo. The uproar is that it is a very classic pose which would be associated with cheesecake shots. Her posure is reminiscent of artistic photos of older females, and so is raising an uproar because Miley is only 15.