history revised or revealed?

ScottSolomon · 05-14-2003, 02:11 PM

I thought most people knew that Americans had not dropped the napalm that was responsible for Kim Phuc's burns. A reader of the International Herald Tribune in a letter to the editor ( around '74 I think - I read it somewhere ) wrote to end the discussion of the question who dropped the bomb: "it is good for the facts to be set straight. However, the power of the photo has nothing to do with who was responsible. It results from the depiction of the unimaginable pain and suffering that war brings to all who play a role in its ugly chain of events."

One could argue that the war would not have gotten to the point that it had without AMerican involvement, but that is really picking nits.

05-14-2003, 02:11 PM	#2
ScottSolomon Coronation Incarnate Join Date: Apr 2003 Location: On the skin of a tiny planet in an obscure galaxy in a lackluster corner of the universe. Posts: 94	I thought most people knew that Americans had not dropped the napalm that was responsible for Kim Phuc's burns. A reader of the International Herald Tribune in a letter to the editor ( around '74 I think - I read it somewhere ) wrote to end the discussion of the question who dropped the bomb: "it is good for the facts to be set straight. However, the power of the photo has nothing to do with who was responsible. It results from the depiction of the unimaginable pain and suffering that war brings to all who play a role in its ugly chain of events." One could argue that the war would not have gotten to the point that it had without AMerican involvement, but that is really picking nits. __________________ The trouble with the world is that the stupid are cocksure and the intelligent are full of doubt. Bertrand Russell Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past. George Orwell

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)