The Cellar  

Go Back   The Cellar > Main > Current Events
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Current Events Help understand the world by talking about things happening in it

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 10-07-2001, 07:36 PM   #2
tw
Read? I only know how to write.
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 11,933
Re: It Begins

Quote:
Originally posted by Vogue State
U.S. and British forces have bombed Afghanistan.
... None of these articles mention any civilian losses.
This goes right back to the 1st paragraph in Perspective without Pictures
"... an extremist movement becomes dangerous when it can recruit moderates"

I was really hoping that US response would have been more sophisticated, more tactical, and more integrated with a long term solution. This is not to say that current attacks do not have those objectives. It only says that at first glance, this attack looks no different than those futile attacks on Saddam. The difference is that Saddam did not have the sympathies of the Muslim and Arab world. bin Laden is different. A big, obvious, flagrant, and conspicuous attack creates instabilities that make recruiting by extremists easier.

An American attack that empowers Taliban enemies is necessary to be a sophisticated response. But how did we properly equip and train those anti-Taliban forces to overrun Kabul? We did not have sufficient time.

We just don't yet know what the targets were, nor how effective they were, nor what the strategic objectives were. But we do know this much. Now that we have used an anti-Saddam type of attack, the problem must be resolved quickly. We have surrendered a major advantage: time.

For example, if Delta or SAS targets for selective cruise missile destruction, then this war could be conducted discretely, effectively, with sufficient time to root out, identify, and kill Al Qaeda leaders. However now that we went in with all guns blazing, we know have a very limited time to get those murders. We must now succeed in weeks or suffer long term consequences. Note the current muted responses from the Arab world. It will not remain that way in a month because both our credibility and our propaganda has not been effective.

I don't like the military response. It reeks too much of cowboy justice. We should have been operating with the sophistication of a scapel. If not completed within weeks, then all fears in that first paragraph of Perspective without Pictures will be realized.

Quote:
History is so full of extremists who became powerful or who created great destruction simply by creating such instability as to make a moderate's position untenable.
We are now very much at the scary edge of that dangerous prophecy. Watch carefully. It is not really the number of dead civilian that matters. What matters now is how quickly we resolve our objectives - either the capture of Al Qaeda or the replacement of the Taliban government by responsible, third party Afghanistans.

Having used a conspicuous and flagrant response, we have now severely limited time to resolve the crisis. That big show better have solve the problem up front. Unfortunately the response reeks too much of a VietNam type mentality - where every intelligence service said there were no targets worth attacking - but we bombed anyway.
tw is offline   Reply With Quote
 


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:17 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.