|
|
|||||||
| Home Base A starting point, and place for threads don't seem to belong anywhere else |
| View Poll Results: Your right to life is not separated from your right to defend that life. | |||
| True |
   
|
15 | 88.24% |
| False |
  
|
2 | 11.76% |
| Voters: 17. You may not vote on this poll | |||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
12-08-2007, 10:20 PM
|
#1 |
|
i am myself
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: via blackberry, maybe
Posts: 750
|
a pacifist that chooses not to defend their life is deciding that being a pacifist is more important than living....it's their right to defend or not.
i think you're actually discussing the decision to act on your right...your right to defend the life that is yours by rights........it's all the same right. the choice does not effect it.
__________________
Whether I shall turn out to be the hero of my own life, or whether that station will be held by anybody else, these pages must show ... -C.Dickens |
|
|
|
12-08-2007, 10:22 PM
|
#2 | |
|
trying hard to be a better person
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 16,493
|
Quote:
I think I know what I'm discussing. I just don't understand why it's hard for you to understand. Do all rights to do with the person belong to the same right? What about the right to breath fresh air? Is that the same right? Just because if you don't breath you'll die doesn't mean you've decided not breathing is more important than living. It simply means you decided not to breath as is your right, and a consequence of that is dying.
__________________
Kind words are the music of the world. F. W. Faber Last edited by Aliantha; 12-08-2007 at 10:28 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
