80,000 cans of Silly String to the troops

Urbane Guerrilla · 10-24-2007, 10:25 PM

What tw, pedlar of half truths, would like you not to know is Barnett isn't going to take military options off the table; international politics and relations simply aren't going to let you succeed if you do. Tw seems to believe I can't appreciate a comprehensive strategy of both war and peace -- well, it's typical of tw to believe what is wrong, as we all know with tw being the prominent exception.

Tw, you're going to have to read what I say, not what you see; your vision has been monstrously distorted as long as I've known you. The evil people are the ones to say the loudest that there are only "different perspectives." "Different perspectives" do occur, but so does good and evil. Yet tw, follower of wrongness that he is, will tell you otherwise to drag you down into his slough.

tw · 10-25-2007, 03:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Urbane Guerrilla

Tw seems to believe I can't appreciate a comprehensive strategy of both war and peace ...

Classic 'big dic' thinking cannot think strategically let alone peace - or even the purpose of war.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Urbane Guerrilla

Personally, I can't get enough war against fascisms and autocracies: ... I'd rather have a desert than a dictatorship.

Barnett's fundamental concepts are about building a world without all that combat. Completely contradictory to the Urbane Guerrilla's political agenda. UG perfers deserts to dictatorships. War solves everything. Ironically, UG's solution is to become a dictatorship as Cheney also advocates.

Barnett is about gloabalization without making deserts. If UG read for facts rather than for a political agenda, then he might understand Barnett.

UG and Cheney sound so much alike. We should be preparing for WWIII. Not because we have enemies. Because people like Urbane Guerrilla and Cheney will do what is necessary to create those enemies. How many nations will be added to the axis of evil? Concepts that morphed into 'Project for a New American Century' would add Germany, Russia, and India to that list.

Urbane Guerrilla is a perfect example of ‘big dic’ thinking that would also rewrite Thomas Barnett’s book. It is called propaganda. Those who most love dictatorships also use propaganda liberally. Another ironic twist. UG uses something 'liberally'?

TheMercenary · 10-25-2007, 08:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tw

Classic 'big dic' thinking...

I am really beginning to think that you are obsessed with "Big Dicks".

tw · 10-26-2007, 04:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheMercenary

I am really beginning to think that you are obsessed with "Big Dicks".

Only when they get into positions of power or try to screw the world.

10-24-2007, 10:25 PM	#1
Urbane Guerrilla Person who doesn't update the user title Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: Southern California Posts: 6,674	What tw, pedlar of half truths, would like you not to know is Barnett isn't going to take military options off the table; international politics and relations simply aren't going to let you succeed if you do. Tw seems to believe I can't appreciate a comprehensive strategy of both war and peace -- well, it's typical of tw to believe what is wrong, as we all know with tw being the prominent exception. Tw, you're going to have to read what I say, not what you see; your vision has been monstrously distorted as long as I've known you. The evil people are the ones to say the loudest that there are only "different perspectives." "Different perspectives" do occur, but so does good and evil. Yet tw, follower of wrongness that he is, will tell you otherwise to drag you down into his slough. __________________ Wanna stop school shootings? End Gun-Free Zones, of course.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)