The Cellar  

Go Back   The Cellar > Main > Politics
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Politics Where we learn not to think less of others who don't share our views

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-25-2007, 04:08 AM   #1
queequeger
Hypercharismatic Telepathical Knight
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: The armpit of the Universe... Augusta, GA
Posts: 365
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aliantha View Post
I would think that the main reason is most of the money donated to charities which include churches, comes from people who've already been taxed on their income, therefor, to tax it again would simply be wrong.
Ain't that the truth. And doesn't that make sales tax/property tax also double taxation as we already pay income tax albeit low... just a thought.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Aliantha View Post
I guess when you get right down to it, if I give money to a church, I would then expect it to be used for the benefit of my community not the government, because I already give the government money in the form of taxes.
Why do you differentiate between the community and the government? I think if you sit down and think about everything our government does with our money you'll see that line blur a lot. Roads, hospitals, community centers, schools, police force, libraries, emergency services, public transit, a military to protect it all, and countless other things I can't think of right now.

All these are things that we couldn't possibly have created as a people had we had a much smaller government that was less localized. Concentration of the money that people contribute to the community (if you think about taxes, church donations, and other things of that nature, they're all personal contributions to a greater organization, willing or not) makes these large scale public works possible. If you ask me, all these services are far more important to my community than any church potlucks that might come out of the collection dish.
__________________
Hoocha, hoocha, hoocha... lobster.
queequeger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2007, 04:15 AM   #2
xoxoxoBruce
The future is unwritten
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 71,105
queequeger, those things you named are funded by money from different governments, federal, state and local.
__________________
The descent of man ~ Nixon, Friedman, Reagan, Trump.
xoxoxoBruce is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2007, 04:20 AM   #3
queequeger
Hypercharismatic Telepathical Knight
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: The armpit of the Universe... Augusta, GA
Posts: 365
Quote:
Originally Posted by xoxoxoBruce View Post
queequeger, those things you named are funded by money from different governments, federal, state and local.
Yup. I don't see that that makes a difference to my argument. Maybe I don't understand your point?

Quote:
I see churches as offering emergency aid to those who've 'fallen on hard times' to use a cliche.
Aha! If we did things my preferred method (i.e. northern european model of social capitalism) the government could fill that role and we'd not have to worry about the people helping the needy trying to convert for their religion. I for one don't think I should have to hear a sermon about the ills of sin to have some soup at a kitchen.
__________________
Hoocha, hoocha, hoocha... lobster.
queequeger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2007, 04:26 AM   #4
xoxoxoBruce
The future is unwritten
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 71,105
Money given to the state and federal government comes back with strings, if at all, to the community. Rarely is it distributed evenly or fairly, so it makes a big difference which taxes you're talking about. You can't blur that line too much.
__________________
The descent of man ~ Nixon, Friedman, Reagan, Trump.
xoxoxoBruce is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2007, 04:47 AM   #5
xoxoxoBruce
The future is unwritten
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 71,105
Well, if you want the US to head for your utopia......
Quote:
Originally Posted by queequeger View Post
Aha! If we did things my preferred method (i.e. northern european model of social capitalism) the government could fill that role and we'd not have to worry about the people helping the needy trying to convert for their religion.
.... then the first thing to do is secure the damn borders or we'd be broke (us & US) in no time.
__________________
The descent of man ~ Nixon, Friedman, Reagan, Trump.
xoxoxoBruce is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2007, 04:55 AM   #6
queequeger
Hypercharismatic Telepathical Knight
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: The armpit of the Universe... Augusta, GA
Posts: 365
Quote:
Originally Posted by xoxoxoBruce View Post
Well, if you want the US to head for your utopia.......... then the first thing to do is secure the damn borders or we'd be broke (us & US) in no time.
Why would we be broke!? This concept that immigrants are going to swoop in and 'steal our welfare check' is ridiculous. People who work make money, pay taxes with that money, buy products that bolster our economy, and the work some more. In short, they're just like us!

They would integrate into the folds of our economy within a few years, and then sure enough I'm willing to bet they'll be complaining about the next wave of immigrants.
__________________
Hoocha, hoocha, hoocha... lobster.
queequeger is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:24 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.