US' new standards

[tw]

Originally Posted by rkzenrage

How Antonio Taguba, who investigated the Abu Ghraib scandal, became one of its casualties.

A retired four-star Army general later told Taguba that he had been sent to the job in the Pentagon so that he could "be watched." Taguba realized that his career was at a dead end.

Clearly those enlisted men did not arrive in Iraq with dog collars and leashes. Exceptions to a well proven guideline do not happen. 85% of all problems are directly traceable to top management. The Taguba report made it apparent that Abu Ghriad was directly traceable to highest levels of government - also called people who TheMercenary would love to have sex with.

Do these people know the difference between sex and torture? We should ask our resident expert on perversion. TheMercenary. How much torture no longer constitutes sex? Or as a voyeur, do you get off when the torture is most extreme? Just trying to understand what perversions propel your kind of people to torture, then deny it, and then blame the little people.

Let's see. If heads were not cut off, then it is not torture; just consensual sex. Cannon fodder sure has a weird way of thinking.

[Undertoad]

Originally Posted by tw

Clearly those enlisted men did not arrive in Iraq with dog collars and leashes.

I'm not saying it wasn't from the top, but I looked into this "dog collar" theory the last time you used this thinking.

It turns out the Army does stock dog collars and leashes. Because the Army uses dogs.

In fact there are several dogs amongst the Abu Ghraib photos.

[TheMercenary]

Originally Posted by tw

We should ask our resident expert on perversion. TheMercenary. .

Actually you would have to go here for that: http://cellar.org/showthread.php?t=14043

[TheMercenary]

Originally Posted by tw

Clearly those enlisted men did not arrive in Iraq with dog collars and leashes.

Clearly they did.
http://www.defenselink.mil/home/feat...ogs/index.html

[tw]

Originally Posted by TheMercenary

Clearly they did.

The reserve units deployed to Abu Ghriad had no dogs. Just because the Army has dogs proves that reserve units in Abu Ghriad had dogs? Well yes when TheMercenary must say anything to blame the enlisted men; claim that Rumsfeld, Miller, et al were totally innocent. Clearly those with his wacko extremist agendas did not condemn Taguba for reporting the truth. And that is TheMercenary's political agenda. Lying is important when his sexual preferences are more important than reality.

TheMercenary - did you have multiple organisms when all those naked bodies were piled together? You previously called that patriotism. But then another already suggested you are a pedophile who wants to do Duck Duck.

This post now in the tone of the new Cellar that started with TheMercenary's postings. Demonising as Rush Limbaugh does and ask TheMercenary does with Hitlery is now acceptable in The Cellar. Now longer is reality more important than a political agenda - and hate.

Since other units in the Army had dogs, then that proved reserve units in Abu Ghriad were also deployed with dogs. After all, a poitical agenda proves it.

[TheMercenary]

Originally Posted by tw

The reserve units deployed to Abu Ghriad had no dogs. Just because the Army has dogs proves that reserve units in Abu Ghriad had dogs? Well yes when TheMercenary must say anything to blame the enlisted men; claim that Rumsfeld, Miller, et al were totally innocent. Clearly those with his wacko extremist agendas did not condemn Taguba for reporting the truth. And that is TheMercenary's political agenda. Lying is important when his sexual preferences are more important than reality.

TheMercenary - did you have multiple organisms when all those naked bodies were piled together? You previously called that patriotism. But then another already suggested you are a pedophile who wants to do Duck Duck.

This post now in the tone of the new Cellar that started with TheMercenary's postings. Demonising as Rush Limbaugh does and ask TheMercenary does with Hitlery is now acceptable in The Cellar. Now longer is reality more important than a political agenda - and hate.

Since other units in the Army had dogs, then that proved reserve units in Abu Ghriad were also deployed with dogs. After all, a poitical agenda proves it.

Well see the problem here is that you have no real experience on which to base your statements. Because one reserve unit was at the prison does not really say much. How about the other units that were stationed there? how about the MPs? Intell guys? Medical support? One area has numerous deployed and assigned people. Most MP orgainzations have dogs.

800th MP Brigade
320th MP Battalion
372nd MP Company
OGA's
"Much of the abuse was conducted by members of the 372nd military police company who arrived at the prison in September, but the documents record the presence, direction and participation of military intelligence as well. They also describe members of covert intelligence agencies and military units hiding some detainees"

http://www.publicintegrity.org/docs/...uba_Report.pdf

http://www.publicintegrity.org/report.aspx?aid=396