Shooting at Virginia Tech

[piercehawkeye45]

Originally Posted by tw

Show me where anyone needs hardware to fire a round every 3 seconds for nine minutes. Clearly he needed that for personal defense, hunting, or to have fun. A post that begs for responses from non-Americans (including Canadians). Tell me if that 'need' sounds justified, necessary, and essential to you?

I was talking about placing restrictions on guns and maybe banning a few. You seem to be talking about placing restrictions on guns and maybe banning a few. I don't see where our disagreement is?

[tw]

Originally Posted by piercehawkeye45

I was talking about placing restrictions on guns and maybe banning a few. You seem to be talking about placing restrictions on guns and maybe banning a few. I don't see where our disagreement is?

None existed. A reply does not intrinsically mean disagreement. My post simply added information (another perspective) to yours.

Same history applies to cars. As access to cars was restricted, then deaths due to cars decreased. Guns and cars. Both are dangerous weapons. Both require responsible behavior.

[piercehawkeye45]

Originally Posted by tw

None existed. A reply does not intrinsically mean disagreement. My post simply added information (another perspective) to yours.

Whoops, sorry about that.

[xoxoxoBruce]

Originally Posted by tw

Urbane Guerrilla forget to mention that part. He also got to mention that many gun advocates oppose 'mental stablity' rules are contrary to the their interpretation of the Second Amendment. According to second admendment 'advocates' even the mentally unstable have a constitutional right to guns - even 155 mm howitizers.

Again tw is caught in a barefaced lie. Claiming "second admendment 'advocates'" say the mentally ill should not be denied firearms.

Originally Posted by xoxoxoBruce

Cite.

Knowing tw's lying, I asked for a cite.

Originally Posted by tw

Second Amendement: "... the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed." Quoted exactly as interpreted by the NRA. The right of the people, if or if not mentally ill, shall not be infringed. Arms - anything from hunting rifles to assault weapons to 155 mm howitzters - shall not be infringed.

Then tw quotes the NRA. tw's second lie can't go unchallenged.

Originally Posted by xoxoxoBruce

Nice try, now cite where the NRA says the mentally ill should not be denied.

Now the 'look a birdy' tactic starts, to cover his lies.

Originally Posted by tw

Bruce, you are doing this more and more often. Are you alright?
I never said, "NRA says the mentally ill should not be denied." Let's look exactly at what I posted: Bruce - again you have jumped to conclusions rather than read what was posted.

In a classic tw move, he claims he never said that and accuses me of jumping to conclusions. Guess what, he didn't say that. He just tries to deceive everyone by posting lies that allude to backing up his lies. Lies to back up lies and more lies to deny the lies.
This is the modus operandi of all tw's posts..... lies, half truths, and fabricating allusions to create more lies.

tw, fuck you, you're not going to get away with it anymore.