![]() |
|
Politics Where we learn not to think less of others who don't share our views |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
UNDER CONDITIONAL MITIGATION
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 20,012
|
Quote:
The problem is that "flat tax" and "a simplified tax system" do not have to go hand-in-hand at all. Hyoi's graphic of the postcard-sized tax form could easily include staggered tax rates from 0% to 40% depending on the income bracket just by adding a couple lines. But a system that simplified is unrealistic anyway--just as one example, how in the world would the self-employed prove their net versus gross income? |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
still eats dirt
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 3,031
|
Quote:
I, personally, don't want a simplified tax system. Deductions and the sliding scale go in my favor and will continue to do so as my life progresses, property is purchased, etc. The benefits of the current system are too great, especially for people with low incomes and those getting their lives started. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
still eats dirt
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 3,031
|
Correction: Happy Monkey pointed it out -- this is a tax on "wages". Stock options, dividends, etc, are absolutely not wages. This is massively flawed.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|