The Legislative Branch has no oversight responsibility over the White House.

Happy Monkey · 03-28-2007, 05:14 PM

Incorrect.

But what is the relevance of the prior terrorist investigations? Were they too busy to get a FISA warrant, too?

TheMercenary · 03-28-2007, 05:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Happy Monkey

Incorrect.

But what is the relevance of the prior terrorist investigations? Were they too busy to get a FISA warrant, too?

I have no idea and neither do you. I know that they were conducted and actively chased, and in many cases captured. The dicotomy here is that people whine because of 9/11 and then they whine because actions were taken to prevent another 9/11, you can't have it both ways.

Happy Monkey · 03-28-2007, 05:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheMercenary

I have no idea and neither do you. I know that they were conducted and actively chased, and in many cases captured.

And they did it with warrants. Great! Let's go back to that.

TheMercenary · 03-28-2007, 05:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Happy Monkey

And they did it with warrants. Great! Let's go back to that.

No, lets not deviate. HM, specifically what has happened DIRECTLY to you where you have lost a right? Anything. Come on, your rights are so under attack, describe your personal loss.

Spexxvet · 03-28-2007, 05:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheMercenary

No, lets not deviate. HM, specifically what has happened DIRECTLY to you where you have lost a right? Anything. Come on, your rights are so under attack, describe your personal loss.

That's silly. It's like asking you "what terrorism has specifically happened to you, that you're willing to give up these rights?"

TheMercenary · 03-28-2007, 05:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Spexxvet

That's silly. It's like asking you "what terrorism has specifically happened to you, that you're willing to give up these rights?"

9/11. Direct loss.

Spexxvet · 03-28-2007, 05:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheMercenary

9/11. Direct loss.

You died?

TheMercenary · 03-28-2007, 05:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Spexxvet

That's silly. It's like asking you "what terrorism has specifically happened to you, that you're willing to give up these rights?"

Same for you SPEX, specifically what has happened DIRECTLY to you where you have lost a right? Anything. Come on, your rights are so under attack, describe your personal loss. Anything??? I really want to know how you have been personally affected. Come on, I am open to hear your stories.

Spexxvet · 03-28-2007, 05:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheMercenary

Same for you SPEX, specifically what has happened DIRECTLY to you where you have lost a right? Anything. Come on, your rights are so under attack, describe your personal loss. Anything??? I really want to know how you have been personally affected. Come on, I am open to hear your stories.

How can I know? They're doing it in SECRET! That's the point. No justification, no probable cause, no court approval, nothing. For all I know, they've gotten all my records about everyfuckingthing I've done through my entire life. After all, I am impotent....er...important.

Why don't you ask the lawyer in the northwest US who was arrested for the Madrid bombings.

03-28-2007, 05:14 PM	#1
Happy Monkey I think this line's mostly filler. Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: DC Posts: 13,575	Incorrect. But what is the relevance of the prior terrorist investigations? Were they too busy to get a FISA warrant, too? __________________ _________________ \|...............\| We live in the nick of times. \| Len 17, Wid 3 \| \|_______________\| [pics]

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)