The Cellar  

Go Back   The Cellar > Main > Politics
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Politics Where we learn not to think less of others who don't share our views

View Poll Results: Which is worse for an individual and society?
Alcohol 34 91.89%
Marijuana 3 8.11%
Voters: 37. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-20-2007, 07:17 AM   #1
DanaC
We have to go back, Kate!
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Yorkshire
Posts: 25,964
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kagen4o4
and if you make pot socially acceptable people wont stop, more people will take it up and you'll have a world full of stoners.
In Amsterdam, they really don't have much of a problem with pot. About the biggest problem they have is people visiting from countries where it is still prohibited and going kid-in-a-sweetshop-crazy on the weed. The locals are a lot less excitable about it.
DanaC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-20-2007, 07:22 AM   #2
busterb
NSABFD
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: MS. usa
Posts: 3,908
What's the difference between a drunk and a junkie?

They'll both steal your billfold.

But the junkie will help you hunt it.
bb 75
__________________
I've haven't left very deep footprints in the sands of time. But, boy I've left a bunch.
busterb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-20-2007, 07:27 AM   #3
DanaC
We have to go back, Kate!
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Yorkshire
Posts: 25,964
define junkie.
DanaC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-20-2007, 08:38 AM   #4
busterb
NSABFD
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: MS. usa
Posts: 3,908
Quote:
Originally Posted by DanaC View Post
define junkie.
Junkie
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The most common term of the word junkie (or junky) is to describe a drug addict. Also, people enthusiastic about any specific thing sometimes call themselves junkies (as in the term "science fiction junkie" or "political junkie").

Heroin has the street name "junk", which would offer an explanation of the word "junkie".
__________________
I've haven't left very deep footprints in the sands of time. But, boy I've left a bunch.
busterb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-20-2007, 12:27 PM   #5
DanaC
We have to go back, Kate!
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Yorkshire
Posts: 25,964
Therefore it doesn't really apply in a discussion about pot and alcohol.
DanaC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-20-2007, 01:48 PM   #6
busterb
NSABFD
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: MS. usa
Posts: 3,908
Quote:
Originally Posted by DanaC View Post
Therefore it doesn't really apply in a discussion about pot and alcohol.
Notice the lame smilie below the post?
__________________
I've haven't left very deep footprints in the sands of time. But, boy I've left a bunch.
busterb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-20-2007, 02:18 PM   #7
piercehawkeye45
Franklin Pierce
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 3,695
Hunglikejesus- I think this thread is identifying the negative effects of both drugs and are getting us to subconsciously wonder why one is legal and one isn't.

Also, just because one has better positive effects doesn't mean that it is also better for society. Both heroine and Advil can cause pain relief and heroine is much better at it but heroine is also much worse for society and that individual.
piercehawkeye45 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-20-2007, 02:34 PM   #8
rkzenrage
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Marijuana is not bad for society.
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-20-2007, 02:46 PM   #9
HungLikeJesus
Only looks like a disaster tourist
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: above 7,000 feet
Posts: 7,208
Quote:
Originally Posted by piercehawkeye45 View Post
Hunglikejesus- I think this thread is identifying the negative effects of both drugs and are getting us to subconsciously wonder why one is legal and one isn't.

Also, just because one has better positive effects doesn't mean that it is also better for society. Both heroine and Advil can cause pain relief and heroine is much better at it but heroine is also much worse for society and that individual.
Piercehawkeye,
You are right, I should have used a smiley. I was just pointing out that question design can lead to biased poll results.

Though reviewing the original question, I noticed this:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Spexxvet View Post
...

I've always felt that pot was better for the individual and society.
....

What do you think?
__________________
Keep Your Bodies Off My Lawn

SteveDallas's Random Thread Picker.
HungLikeJesus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-20-2007, 03:09 PM   #10
rkzenrage
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
You cannot do permanent harm with pot, you cannot "OD" on pot, urban myths.
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-20-2007, 03:57 PM   #11
Kitsune
still eats dirt
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 3,031
Quote:
Originally Posted by rkzenrage View Post
You cannot do permanent harm with pot, you cannot "OD" on pot, urban myths.
Possibly, although it is pretty easy to figure out who is a "heavy user" by simply watching or verbally interacting with them. It might not be permanent but there is, at the very least, an effect that lingers well beyond the intended one.
Kitsune is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-20-2007, 04:30 PM   #12
Happy Monkey
I think this line's mostly filler.
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: DC
Posts: 13,575
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kitsune View Post
Possibly, although it is pretty easy to figure out who is a "heavy user" by simply watching or verbally interacting with them. It might not be permanent but there is, at the very least, an effect that lingers well beyond the intended one.
Sounds like cholesterol...
__________________
_________________
|...............| We live in the nick of times.
| Len 17, Wid 3 |
|_______________| [pics]
Happy Monkey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-20-2007, 04:31 PM   #13
rkzenrage
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kitsune View Post
Possibly, although it is pretty easy to figure out who is a "heavy user" by simply watching or verbally interacting with them. It might not be permanent but there is, at the very least, an effect that lingers well beyond the intended one.
The brain has an amazing ability to heal itself even from those drugs that do harm it. Even from heavy meth use the brain will be back to normal dopamine production within a year. Marijuana does not kill brain cells or inhibit production of any hormones. If someone has retarded their social skills through isolation and lack of education you may want to lay that at the door of one aspect of their life, I put it where it truly lies, choice... unless they were born limited. Then marijuana use would not have made a difference.
As stated by another here, the larger town next to me has a city planner, someone I know, who smokes daily, and has since his teens. One of the most articulate, intelligent and outgoing men I have ever known.
The "pot-head" being created by smoking is a myth and always has been.
Hell, I have known people who were competative bodybuilders (before the days of rampant testing) who smoked before they worked out. Not a choice I would have made, but to each their own. He said it helped him to calm down and relax.
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-20-2007, 05:44 PM   #14
Toymented
Without Explanation
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 63
Quote:
Originally Posted by rkzenrage View Post
The brain has an amazing ability to heal itself even from those drugs that do harm it. Even from heavy meth use the brain will be back to normal dopamine production within a year. Marijuana does not kill brain cells or inhibit production of any hormones. If someone has retarded their social skills through isolation and lack of education you may want to lay that at the door of one aspect of their life, I put it where it truly lies, choice... unless they were born limited. Then marijuana use would not have made a difference.
As stated by another here, the larger town next to me has a city planner, someone I know, who smokes daily, and has since his teens. One of the most articulate, intelligent and outgoing men I have ever known.
The "pot-head" being created by smoking is a myth and always has been.
Hell, I have known people who were competative bodybuilders (before the days of rampant testing) who smoked before they worked out. Not a choice I would have made, but to each their own. He said it helped him to calm down and relax.
So you recommend it and ascribe benefit?
Toymented is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-20-2007, 06:38 PM   #15
rkzenrage
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by Toymented View Post
Sorry you can't see it. Do you fear being labeled?
Not remotely, people that do that are ignorant and should be ignored.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toymented View Post
So you recommend it and ascribe benefit?
Depends on the individual, how and why they use it.
For me, I use it for medical benefit. Due to my pain level I do not get high off of it, so yes, for that absolutely. There are days that go by when I could not eat without it. It also reduces muscle spasms drastically for me and affects of nerve damage.

As for recreational use, it is very relaxing and fun and does not have the lasting negative affects that alcohol has. Between the two there is no choice IMO. Though this is no longer an option for me and I had long stopped using it for that when I became very ill, I never felt it was a bad thing.

As for the above statement, there is nothing in marijuana that is physically addictive. Some may become mentally dependent on it, but they would become so on something anyway.
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:25 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.