A way out of Iraq

jaguar · 01-17-2003, 09:05 PM

You know i keep hearing what an SOB the PS2 is to code on, somehow i don't think this is the most serious risk out there.

*sighs*, it's all just so silly.
DPRK mobilise troops, reopen reactors and start reprocessing fule rods to get plutonium for an admitted nuclear weapons program and the situation according to Bush will have a diplomatic solution. Keep in mind the DPRK has one of they worlds most formidable armies, and one of the largest, far larger than the ROK and US forces in the area combined as well as two suspected Nukes.

They find absolutely sweet fuck all in Iraq in terms of either links to terrorists or Chem/Bio weaponary (except for some ancient, empty chem shells which were probably sold to them by the US in the first place) despite a huge concerted intel effort and well - by god we better get in there fast and bomb the bastards back to the stone age - clearly they're hiding something.

I think the difference is that they can't garantee they would win a DPRK/ROK shitfest without losing a few people and maybe a million or 3 Koreans and that might cause them to drop a populatiry point or two. Whereas Iraq they can just bomb to hell from 30,000 feet and no one cares about killing half a million god damned terrorist supporting sandniggers, right?

01-17-2003, 09:05 PM	#12
jaguar whig Join Date: Apr 2001 Posts: 5,075	You know i keep hearing what an SOB the PS2 is to code on, somehow i don't think this is the most serious risk out there. sighs, it's all just so silly. DPRK mobilise troops, reopen reactors and start reprocessing fule rods to get plutonium for an admitted nuclear weapons program and the situation according to Bush will have a diplomatic solution. Keep in mind the DPRK has one of they worlds most formidable armies, and one of the largest, far larger than the ROK and US forces in the area combined as well as two suspected Nukes. They find absolutely sweet fuck all in Iraq in terms of either links to terrorists or Chem/Bio weaponary (except for some ancient, empty chem shells which were probably sold to them by the US in the first place) despite a huge concerted intel effort and well - by god we better get in there fast and bomb the bastards back to the stone age - clearly they're hiding something. I think the difference is that they can't garantee they would win a DPRK/ROK shitfest without losing a few people and maybe a million or 3 Koreans and that might cause them to drop a populatiry point or two. Whereas Iraq they can just bomb to hell from 30,000 feet and no one cares about killing half a million god damned terrorist supporting sandniggers, right? __________________ Good friends, good books and a sleepy conscience: this is the ideal life. - Twain Last edited by jaguar; 01-17-2003 at 09:08 PM.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)