![]() |
|
Quality Images and Videos Post your own images and videos of your own days |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Esnohplad Semaj Ton
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: A little south of sanity
Posts: 2,259
|
I'd agree it might be photoshopped, but not because of any disparity between upper/lower body.
My upper body is way less developed than my lower body. It's not uncommon, really--look at joggers, bikers, soccerers, etc. Bodybuilders will pump their upper body up to massive proportions, but more fitness-minded people will have more massive legs and moderately proportioned upper bodies. Just an e.g., I can rep* 500 lb. squats and 1,200 lb. leg presses, but I can't rep more than 225 or so on a bench press. * our colloq. defn. of rep is that it's an amount you can do several (2+) reps of on at least two sets. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Touring the facilities
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: The plains of Colorado
Posts: 3,476
|
My husband is built kind of that way too, with very strong, large legs. Personally, I like that in a guy much better than the out of proportion giant upper body and small legs look we see so often touted as the ideal.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Snowflake
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Dystopia
Posts: 13,136
|
It's a classical (pre-steroid-era) physique, reminiscent of Sandow (pictured below).
The arms and legs are properly proportioned. The leg in question looks bigger because it is foreshortened.
__________________
****************** There's a level of facility that everyone needs to accomplish, and from there it's a matter of deciding for yourself how important ultra-facility is to your expression. ... I found, like Joseph Campbell said, if you just follow whatever gives you a little joy or excitement or awe, then you're on the right track. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Terry Bozzio |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|