The Cellar  

Go Back   The Cellar > Main > Current Events
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Current Events Help understand the world by talking about things happening in it

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-27-2007, 06:01 PM   #1
wolf
lobber of scimitars
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Phila Burbs
Posts: 20,774
I'm always careful when I'm eating fish. There's all those bones.
__________________
wolf eht htiw og

"Conspiracies are the norm, not the exception." --G. Edward Griffin The Creature from Jekyll Island

High Priestess of the Church of the Whale Penis
wolf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2007, 12:06 AM   #2
xoxoxoBruce
The future is unwritten
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 71,105
Quote:
To end the deception about fish names, I suggest that scientific names of all fish varieties be used in trade. So it doesn't matter if one calls a particular fish as a slimehead or an orange roughy. However, if it is labelled as Hoplostethus atlanticus in commerce and trade, it makes it more difficult to make up new names to disguise an illegal catch.
This from the guy that wanted the simplify spelling. Doesn't matter what they call it, you have no way of knowing what you're eating. Whether they change the proper name verses a common name makes no difference. Deception is the name of the game, not loopholes.
__________________
The descent of man ~ Nixon, Friedman, Reagan, Trump.
xoxoxoBruce is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2007, 03:20 AM   #3
Kingswood
Draco dormiens nunquam titillandus
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Melbourne, Vic
Posts: 316
Quote:
Originally Posted by xoxoxoBruce View Post
This from the guy that wanted the simplify spelling. Doesn't matter what they call it, you have no way of knowing what you're eating. Whether they change the proper name verses a common name makes no difference. Deception is the name of the game, not loopholes.
Scientific names are the one unambiguous way of naming an organism. It would be similar to using a scientific name when purchasing chemicals.

The obvious difference is that chemicals must be correct or else one could be in big trouble if the wrong chemical is purchased (for example, a big boom followed by a big lawsuit from the survivors), whereas someone buying fish at the market - whether fresh off the boat or at the fishmongers - is likely to say "Meh" and just buy the damn thing anyway. It may be impractical if one is not always able to identify a particular catch of fish down to the species level.

But there is a way to circumvent the deceptive names. Just register them as trademarks and sue anyone who uses them.
Kingswood is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2007, 06:22 AM   #4
xoxoxoBruce
The future is unwritten
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 71,105
I doubt you can trademark names that have been in use already. I really don't see how the consumer can have much influence short of boycotting fish entirely. To rely on the fishmongers to keep everything up and up is naive....their kids get hungry too. Lastly, I'm always hesitant to advocate the government get into anything. That said, I'll be damned if I can think of another way to have any effect. I also think it depends on Japan, as they're the major seafood hounds.
__________________
The descent of man ~ Nixon, Friedman, Reagan, Trump.
xoxoxoBruce is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:45 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.