The Cellar  

Go Back   The Cellar > Main > Politics
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Politics Where we learn not to think less of others who don't share our views

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 02-23-2007, 11:15 PM   #11
tw
Read? I only know how to write.
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 11,933
From The Economist of 17 Feb 2007:
Quote:
Dick Cheney has never been a great fan of open government. His staff refuse to reveal how many people work in his office, let alone what they do there. He went to court to keep the membership of his energy commission secret. You can find the White House and the Pentagon on Google Earth. But the vice-president's official residence is pixellated out. ...

Mr Cheney ... has the largest vice-presidential staff in history (an estimate 14 national security advisers compared with Al Gore's four, for example) and vassals in most branches of government. ...

The two characteristics that have emerged most clearly are ruthlessness and obsessive attention to detail. Mr Cheney was clearly determined to punish Joseph Wilson for casting doubt on some of the administrations' claims about WMD. ....

And from the moment he cut Mr Wilson's article out of the New York Times and scrawled notes all over it, Mr Cheney devoted a striking amount of energy to the administration's offensive against him. According to Mr Libby and a former PR aide, he dictated taking points for press officers to use. He discussed the case several times a day with Mr Libby, told him to deal directly with selected reporters, and instructed him to leak a sensitive document. Mr Libby's leaks are what landed him in trouble: ...

One possible explanation is that Mr Cheney knew that the administration's claims about WMD were false. But it seems unlikely. Mr Cheney continued to argue that Saddam possessed WMD long after Mr Bush had backed down. Hi problem was that he could not see evidence to the contrary. The other, more probable, explanation is that Mr Cheney was engaged in a personal vendetta, ...

He started his career as a failed academic, dropping out of Yale after a few terms and never completing his PhD at the University of Wisconsin. But he flourished with he came to Washington: attracted the attention of Donald Rumsfeld, rapidly climbing the greasy pole, and becoming Gerald Ford's chief of staff at the age of 34. ...

Mr Cheney seems to have acquired a profound distrust of the CIA. He became convinced that the CIA was underestimating the Soviet military building-up. [CIA was actually overestimating it] He lent his support to something called "Team B", a group of foreign-policy experts who made it their business to second-guess the CIA over the Soviet threat. Mr Cheney's distrust of the CIA grew even stronger in the 1990s when he concluded that the agency had misjudged Saddam's military capabilities ... He relied on his own intelligence sources ...

Where did Mr Cheney get his fervour from? The average Washington insider in a consummate trimmer. Mr Cheney comes across as a man firmly in the grip of an ideology. It will take more than the Scooter Libby trial to explain him fully. But at least Americans have learned a little bit more about the power behind King George’s throne.
tw is offline   Reply With Quote
 


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:06 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.