The Cellar  

Go Back   The Cellar > Main > Current Events
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Current Events Help understand the world by talking about things happening in it

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-15-2007, 09:42 PM   #1
Ibby
erika
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: "the high up north"
Posts: 6,127
That NASA under Bush sucks.

We all knew that already, though, so I guess this is just here to make sure we've seen the story.
__________________
not really back, you didn't see me, i was never here shhhhhh
Ibby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2007, 09:46 PM   #2
Beestie
-◊|≡·∙■·∙≡|◊-
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Parts unknown.
Posts: 4,081
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ibram View Post
We all knew that already, though, so I guess this is just here to make sure we've seen the story.
This story appeared in the New York Times on January 29, 2006 - a date curiously edited out of the post. Not exactly "breaking news."
__________________
Beestie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-2007, 12:12 AM   #3
tw
Read? I only know how to write.
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 11,933
Quote:
Originally Posted by Beestie View Post
This story appeared in the New York Times on January 29, 2006
It was also posted here in The Cellar on 16 February 2006 in Bush's Shrinking Safety Zone

Also discussed on 6 Mar 2006 in Perverting science for politics .

(Meanwhile, UG posted his analysis on 14 Mar, "Tw, post #85 demonstrates that you are only half bright, ... ")

Well that proves it. Even 60 Minutes that reported this same scientific censorship on 19 Mar 2006 was also wrong.

Last edited by tw; 01-16-2007 at 12:18 AM.
tw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-2007, 12:46 AM   #4
Beestie
-◊|≡·∙■·∙≡|◊-
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Parts unknown.
Posts: 4,081
Quote:
Originally Posted by tw View Post
It was also posted here in The Cellar on 16 February 2006 in Bush's Shrinking Safety Zone

Also discussed on 6 Mar 2006 in Perverting science for politics .

(Meanwhile, UG posted his analysis on 14 Mar, "Tw, post #85 demonstrates that you are only half bright, ... ")

Well that proves it. Even 60 Minutes that reported this same scientific censorship on 19 Mar 2006 was also wrong.
Well I can certainly understand how you might have missed my point about not posting the exact same thing over and over.
__________________

Last edited by Beestie; 01-16-2007 at 01:06 AM.
Beestie is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:52 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.