Sexual history doesn't matter? Who would marry a porn star?

[Aliantha]

I assure you BMW, that you're the one having difficulties with comprehension, but that's ok. It doesn't make any difference really. I was clear in my communication; everyone else can understand my point; you're the only one who's confused.

Anyway, as I said, when you've got something to add to the point, get back to me, otherwise, don't bother responding.

Oh, and one more thing, I have not insulted you once other than to point out - in response to your own comment - that it seems you come from a family that doesn't value respectful communication.

Originally Posted by Aliantha

I assure you BMW, that you're the one having difficulties with comprehension, but that's ok. It doesn't make any difference really. I was clear in my communication; everyone else can understand my point; you're the only one who's confused.

Anyway, as I said, when you've got something to add to the point, get back to me, otherwise, don't bother responding.

Oh, and one more thing, I have not insulted you once other than to point out - in response to your own comment - that it seems you come from a family that doesn't value respectful communication.

How am I having difficulties? You twisted my sentence to insult me and now want to stand by your insult. FU!

Show me where I confused your statement that I wanted to be sexualized by men! It was quite clear I was responding to your statement regarding men wearing skirts and being sexualized by WOMEN.

You purposely rework the response to insult me and I find it more insulting that you have the gall to sit there and continue to stand behind it. FU twice!

As for the rest of the cheap shot jack-offs on this board.

You want to insult me, fine, but don't cry foul when I throw an insult back at you. Thats what a double standard is.
I also want to thank all those copy editors who find it within themselves to correct my grammar and spelling.

Skirts shirts, my eye sight ain't what it used to be. Be that as it may I don't think it changes the point enough so that it can't be understood, typo's, and grammar snafus in all.

[Stormieweather]

Originally Posted by bmwmcaw

Show me where I confused your statement that I wanted to be sexualized by men! It was quite clear I was responding to your statement regarding men wearing skirts and being sexualized by WOMEN.

Sex with men? Someone said something about sex with men? I thought sexualized was the word that was used. Sexualize = To make sexual in character or quality, not have intercourse with.

Skirts, Shirts..whatever? Aliantha never made any statement regarding men wearing skirts. YOU DID.

HUGE difference there bud. The point being that MEN that go without their shirts are macho and hot, which is OK, but WOMEN that go without their shirts (IE: TOPLESS you nincompoop) are sluts and asking for sex which is NOT OK.

Skirts or pants are completely irrelevant.

But you are unable to admit you made a mistake so you're sticking with your erroneous babble and adding insult to injury by flinging some verbal abuse about. How pathetic.

Stormie

Originally Posted by Stormieweather

Sex with men? Someone said something about sex with men? I thought sexualized was the word that was used. Sexualize = To make sexual in character or quality, not have intercourse with.

Skirts, Shirts..whatever? Aliantha never made any statement regarding men wearing skirts. YOU DID.

HUGE difference there bud. The point being that MEN that go without their shirts are macho and hot, which is OK, but WOMEN that go without their shirts (IE: TOPLESS you nincompoop) are sluts and asking for sex which is NOT OK.

Skirts or pants are completely irrelevant.

But you are unable to admit you made a mistake so you're sticking with your erroneous babble and adding insult to injury by flinging some verbal abuse about. How pathetic.

Stormie

Originally Posted by Aliantha

You'd rather be sexualised by men than women?

This is the quote I am insulted by. It is what I have been expressing my anger at. It is a repugnant and grotesque statement. Its not the first time a women has used the gay angle to belittle men that don’t eat out of there hands but it’s an offensive comment. Its written as a question doesn't hide its intent.

If I mistook skirt for shirt than that’s that, but my reply was in jest and she turn it into a despicable insult. I can’t even match it with profanity in response, it’s that bad. Homosexuality is an abomination of mankind.

In all my writing no matter how raw or direct it has been I have never attached on anyone in anyway such an immorality.

Here what "sexualized" can mean...

http://www.m-w.com/dictionary/sexualized

Now heres the link to one of the definition...
http://www.m-w.com/dictionary/sexual