The New Frontman

Ibby · 08-09-2006, 11:05 AM

its all a case-by-case thing.

Elspode · 08-09-2006, 02:04 PM

Whether or not it is a good idea, some bands just don't want to stop making music. Fan acceptance is another matter entirely, and often is based on the success or charisma of the replacement.

Genesis is perhaps the best example of extreme success, as they had by far their biggest popularity and sales after Phil Collins took the fore. And make no mistake, Peter Gabriel was a tough damn act to follow. However, Phil had sung even when Pete was the guy, and their voices were not terribly dissimilar in those days. This allowed the band to keep giving the fans the old, extremely cool numbers in a fine fashion, while moving on and making new stuff that was equally cool, if much different.

On the other end of the scale, you have Van Halen, who obviously did not appreciate what David Lee Roth brought to their act. Now, DLR is a moron and a marginal solo performer at best, but...VH was never the same without him.

I agree that some people are irreplaceable...Freddie Mercury, Ronnie Van Zant, Lowell George, Jerry Garcia. I'm sure there are more.

I still respect the fact that musicians want to continue making their music. Hell, I'm pissed that what's left of The Who isn't coming to my town.

View Poll Results: Do you think getting a new frontman is a good idea?
No, it is an obvious sellout by rockers who've lost their way.	2	20.00%
Yes, some bands are even better with a new guy rather than a dead guy.	3	30.00%
I just judge the music man, labels don't matter.	5	50.00%
Voters: 10. You may not vote on this poll

08-09-2006, 11:05 AM	#1
Ibby erika Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: "the high up north" Posts: 6,127	its all a case-by-case thing. __________________ not really back, you didn't see me, i was never here shhhhhh

08-09-2006, 02:04 PM	#2
Elspode When Do I Get Virtual Unreality? Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: Raytown, Missouri Posts: 12,719	Whether or not it is a good idea, some bands just don't want to stop making music. Fan acceptance is another matter entirely, and often is based on the success or charisma of the replacement. Genesis is perhaps the best example of extreme success, as they had by far their biggest popularity and sales after Phil Collins took the fore. And make no mistake, Peter Gabriel was a tough damn act to follow. However, Phil had sung even when Pete was the guy, and their voices were not terribly dissimilar in those days. This allowed the band to keep giving the fans the old, extremely cool numbers in a fine fashion, while moving on and making new stuff that was equally cool, if much different. On the other end of the scale, you have Van Halen, who obviously did not appreciate what David Lee Roth brought to their act. Now, DLR is a moron and a marginal solo performer at best, but...VH was never the same without him. I agree that some people are irreplaceable...Freddie Mercury, Ronnie Van Zant, Lowell George, Jerry Garcia. I'm sure there are more. I still respect the fact that musicians want to continue making their music. Hell, I'm pissed that what's left of The Who isn't coming to my town. __________________ "To those of you who are wearing ties, I think my dad would appreciate it if you took them off." - Robert Moog

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)