![]() |
|
Philosophy Religions, schools of thought, matters of importance and navel-gazing |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Bioengineer and aspiring lawer
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 872
|
We have a Mormon sect near us that has mostly kept to themselves, very agreeable people usually. They are also one of the few groups around here pushing more liberal marriage laws. Editorial letters written by members can be read in our paper from time to time urging people to espouse the philosophy that marriage cannot be defined by only one definition. The key in all this is, however, that they want the laws passed with articles allowing the marriage of multiple persons. Sneaky
![]()
__________________
The most valuable renewable resource is stupidity. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
When Do I Get Virtual Unreality?
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Raytown, Missouri
Posts: 12,719
|
I think the marriage of multiple persons is perfectly fine...as long as they are all of legal age of consent. These guys marry *children* if they can. That's bad juju.
__________________
"To those of you who are wearing ties, I think my dad would appreciate it if you took them off." - Robert Moog |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
The future is unwritten
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 71,105
|
Multiple mothers-in-law?
![]()
__________________
The descent of man ~ Nixon, Friedman, Reagan, Trump. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|