Understanding terrorism

[Urbane Guerrilla]

Indonesia as a terrorist nation is clearly absurd; only for those who blindly believe; reality be damned.

Read Allah's Torch, by Tracy Dahlby, you incompetent.

While the situation there looks defusable from the international relations viewpoint, I don't think we've heard the last of them.

After all, I'm sure you can find someone somewhere to rant about any particular issue.

As evidenced by the worthy TW. Good thing I'm not going to take him seriously. He shows me yet another example of what leftism does to the weak-minded -- further data.

"Least" you forget? -- don't ever try hiring on as a copyeditor.

[tw]

Originally Posted by Urbane Guerrilla

As evidenced by the worthy TW. Good thing I'm not going to take him seriously. He shows me yet another example of what leftism does to the weak-minded -- further data.

Urbane Guerrilla, as a typical left or right wing extremist must do, cannot admit he had no proof for his speculation "that Saddam was hooked up with the terror guys". He admits, using silence, of no knowledge that "Saddam was hooked up with the terror guys". Silence is preferable to being honest when playing propaganda games.

Centrists first need facts before making a conclusion. Extremists will even lie to justify preordained agendas. Urbane Guerrilla will not admit it, but honesty appears to be not part of his character. That is the problem with having extremist and preordained agendas. Honesty no longer matters when propaganda and the agenda is more important.

Of course, UG still could demonstrate honesty. He still has the oppurtunity to prove his statement "that Saddam was hooked up with the terror guys". He admits, by silence, of no knowledge that "Saddam was hooked up with the terror guys". But he can't for two reasons. 1) No proof exists AND 2) that would be contrary to who Urbane Guerrilla is. Honesty and extremism are mutually exclusive.

But who is Urbane Guerrilla? Can Urbane Guerrilla name someone who is too right wing for him; more right wing then himself?