Watergate's Deep Throat Revealed

lookout123 · 06-10-2005, 01:59 PM

Quote:

Facts again in the face of lookout123's emotional attitudes.

once again, tw WTF are you talking about? i don't revere Mark Felt the way you do, so i must be making emotional assumptions? his work in helping bring down a crooked politician is a positive. i still think that he could and should have done it a better way. that's just me though, you are free to think whatever you want - just don't make the assumption that because my thoughts differ from your own that i must be irrational and wrong.

did you even read my post toward the top of the page? or is this just another example of you choosing to ignore something that hits a little close to home?

and about providing proof for male reactions to the presence of female danger on the battlefield - you know as well as anyone that it is unproveable one way or the other. human emotion and reaction to these stresses is unquantifiable. in that area, i will have to go back to my experiences in the military in deployed situations over the last 13 years - i'm the air force so most of our jobs aren't classified as combat (which means we have women in almost every job) and yet, we have been in combat zones frequently. i stand by my earlier post.

tw · 06-10-2005, 05:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lookout123

once again, tw WTF are you talking about? i don't revere Mark Felt the way you do, so i must be making emotional assumptions?

The bible does not tell you how to regard whistle blowers. And since whistle blowers are a threat to a lying president, then Mark Felt must be evil. That is clearly what you have posted. You are just trying to be too politically correct to be honest.

"WTF" - clearly there is a devil in you. Or are you just being emotional (angry) again. God may smite you. Be careful what you post.

lookout123 · 06-10-2005, 05:26 PM

well, there's a hell of a way to answer questions, i suppose.

tw · 06-10-2005, 06:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lookout123

i stand by my earlier post.

Just as George Jr stood by claims that Saddam had weapons of mass destruction? Anyone can use emotions to conclude anything. But if women in combat was such a problem, then the problem can even be quantified. Lookout123 instead would have us believe it cannot be quantified. Rush Limbaugh type propaganda.

No facts exist or prove that women in combat is a problem, just as there are not facts in lookout123's reasoning. He just *feels* it must be true. That is sufficient for him to declare it a fact.

And so we have the same logic that also justifies evolution. "I feel, therefore it must be true".

lookout123 · 06-10-2005, 06:09 PM

yep, that is exactly what i said. way to summarize. don't know what the world would do without you,pal.

06-10-2005, 05:26 PM	#3
lookout123 changed his status to single Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Right behind you. No, the other side. Posts: 10,308	well, there's a hell of a way to answer questions, i suppose. __________________ Getting knocked down is no sin, it's not getting back up that's the sin

06-10-2005, 06:09 PM	#5
lookout123 changed his status to single Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Right behind you. No, the other side. Posts: 10,308	yep, that is exactly what i said. way to summarize. don't know what the world would do without you,pal. __________________ Getting knocked down is no sin, it's not getting back up that's the sin

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)