![]() |
|
Current Events Help understand the world by talking about things happening in it |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 |
I think this line's mostly filler.
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: DC
Posts: 13,575
|
It's hard to tell right now. It could go either way, at this point, but the latter path would require some guts on the part of the judge. The official report has already cleared the upper level commanders. I'm not optimistic.
__________________
_________________ |...............| We live in the nick of times. | Len 17, Wid 3 | |_______________| [pics] |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Victim of gravity
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Hiding in plain sight
Posts: 1,412
|
Can somebody explain the logic of this ruling? The judge does not believe that she actually thought at the time that what she was doing was wrong? So therefore she has to plead innocent even though she NOW believes she is guilty? And after practically everybody thinks she was following the lead of somebody already convicted and sentenced, does that make HER innocent for playing along with her lover? Or does it make her guilty by association, in which case why are they making HER plead innocent? Is this "law" or is it "The Military" way of reasoning?
![]()
__________________
Everything you've ever heard about Fresno is true. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|