The Cellar  

Go Back   The Cellar > Main > Technology
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Technology Computing, programming, science, electronics, telecommunications, etc.

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 12-21-2004, 01:39 PM   #5
Bitman
cellar smellar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: californy, baby!
Posts: 403
Quote:
Originally Posted by tw
Now that transistors are constructed with as little as three atom thickenesses
Um, I think that's only in the lab. Which means that faster processors are coming. And though those atomic chips will be among the fastest MHz chips possible, smarter chips will still provide more usable speed.

Intel's a bad example to use in this comparison; the original mandate for the Pentium 4 was "more megahurtzes at any cost," but the engineers failed. The 130nm chip contained circuits that just barely worked; when they moved to 90nm, they had to overhaul quite alot, doubling the number of transistors required. That alone burned up all the advantage that 90nm brought.

IBM and AMD are getting good results from 90nm, but the % improvement is less than with 130nm despite the higher cost. Same thing will likely happen with every subsequent generation -- more money, less benefit. So we're definitely sinking, but there's no brick wall.
Bitman is offline   Reply With Quote
 


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:40 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.