The Politics of a Health Crisis

[BigV]

Originally Posted by Urbane Guerrilla

When you have arguments from data, argument from authority won't cut it.

Ok

Sounds about right. What part of the thread are you talking about?

[Urbane Guerrilla]

Originally Posted by BigV

Ok

Sounds about right. What part of the thread are you talking about?

Oh, this sort of thing: "On my authority as Speaker, Donald Trump is NOT ALLOWED a win, even in medicine, even if he took a medicine prophylactically, especially since it's with apparent success." Puh-leeeze. Let's have signs of intelligent life in the House; is that somehow too much to ask? I'm tired of the bigotry there.

[BigV]

Originally Posted by Urbane Guerrilla

Oh, this sort of thing: "On my authority as Speaker, Donald Trump is NOT ALLOWED a win, even in medicine, even if he took a medicine prophylactically, especially since it's with apparent success." Puh-leeeze. Let's have signs of intelligent life in the House; is that somehow too much to ask? I'm tired of the bigotry there.

cite please.

[Urbane Guerrilla]

Originally Posted by BigV

cite please.

Well -- is it some conspiracy? -- or is it a culture, and a norm for said culture? Who needs a conspiracy when he has a culture? Are any of those candidates actually stating a reason to vote for them, and their programs? I can't hear them.

Mark Levin has made considerable public comment on the Democrats' prejudiced behavior toward Donald John Trump. It is strictly prejudiced to conduct an impeachment where it's "impeachment first, offense later" -- a miscarriage of injustice. Justice, as a rule, runs the other way, offense first, and winning an election against the Mistress of Corruption is no actionable offense. Credit for frequent competent action is refused -- the Democrats are treating Trump the way they treated niggers, what with the lynchings and other fun times -- Democrat show all the way. They *do* seem to have trouble getting Trump throttled.

Two television networks are establishing a reputation for aiding and abetting the Democrats' anti-libertarian campaign. Antilibertarian campaigning is toxic, antieconomic, and slavemongering.

You know, I didn't vote for Trump the first time. Then he started implementing all these libertarian-style policies. Here comes the second.

[xoxoxoBruce]

So you can't cite.

[tw]

He heard it on Fox News. It must be true.

[Urbane Guerrilla]

Originally Posted by xoxoxoBruce

So you can't cite.

Sorry, but Mark Levin's oeuvre is a cite, and it's comprehensive -- as you might know, once you can be arsed to start reading Levin's works. You do need to be prepared to leave the anti-American club treehouse, though. Such preparation is not difficult.

With Levin, Ben Shapiro. Somebody else you manifestly do not know.

I keep discovering all these people with training in law, who then started writing. And law school wasn't their only credential.

"Democrats won't let you work, but they'll let you riot . . ."

[tw]

Originally Posted by Urbane Guerrilla

"Democrats won't let you work, but they'll let you riot . . ."

Republicans destroyed jobs, terminated what was a balanced budget, and created a massive downturn between 2000 and 2008. A recession that was terminated by what Democrats (and some moderate - therefore patriot Republicans) did in 2008 through 2018. By that point, the extremist Republican president had done so much economic harm that another recession was started. Forcing the Fed to lower interest rates multiple times - by even calling an emergency Fed meeting.

So who is creating jobs and who destroys jobs by enriching the rich with tax cuts and even bigger debts? Oh. That reality contradicts what Fox News orders us to believe. So we ignore it and deny it.