You must have an enemy

[henry quirk]

Originally Posted by sexobon

The definitions can be a slippery slope.

True, but kinda beside the (my) point.

Originally Posted by Luce

Given the two groups I mentioned, I don't believe in giving them a warning.

Do you think one is warranted? Both of those groups are pretty odious, and a direct existential danger to everyone around them.

Originally Posted by henry quirk

As for my point: don't lay hands on the other guy till he lays hands on you, no matter how odious his thinkin' is.

[Luce]

Originally Posted by henry quirk

True, but kinda beside the (my) point.

Okay, I see your point. I just don't agree.

[henry quirk]

Okay, I see your point. I just don't agree.

Really? It's perfectly acceptable to whack the hell outta somebody for 'thought crime'?

[Luce]

Originally Posted by henry quirk

Really? It's perfectly acceptable to whack the hell outta somebody for 'thought crime'?

Last time we waited for Nazis to behave, they burned Europe down.

And ISIS kinda speaks for itself. Their idea of behaving is to kill a person prior to cutting their head off with a pocket knife.

[henry quirk]

Originally Posted by Luce

Last time we waited for Nazis to behave, they burned Europe down.

But we're not talkin' about then, we're talkin' about now; we're not talkin' about an army or government, we're talkin' about some nimrod sportin' a swastika.

And ISIS kinda speaks for itself. Their idea of behaving is to kill a person prior to cutting their head off with a pocket knife.

Okay, you're havin' lunch, at the table next to you a fellow is spoutin' off about his admiration of ISIS and how he plans to join them. You gonna punch him in the head? For bein' stupid?