Marsy's Law

[glatt]

Originally Posted by tw

All still ignored - because that is what extremists do - "wreck shit". Not one honest answer.

What makes you think any of us knows the answer?

Griff came here asking our thoughts. We speak English and could read the text of law and gave our thoughts.

Sure. It would be interesting to know who is behind the push for the law. Why don't you go find out and come back and tell us instead of insulting everyone?

[xoxoxoBruce]

It's a moot point...

Marsy’s Law votes won’t be counted, Pa. Supreme Court rules in split opinion.

link

[tw]

Originally Posted by glatt

What makes you think any of us knows the answer?
Griff came here asking our thoughts.

If you cannot answer the question, then why are you posting? Griff and I have both asked for your thoughts. Not emotional outbursts. I already have answers to those questions. But like Griff, I asked to know what others thought. Since learning how biased or uninformed other can be is also informative.

Instead, so many only posted insults. Without bothering to answer any relevant questions.

Who is pushing all this? And why? What really is the objective? What really is the problem that must be solved?

Whereas xoxoxoBruce noted the Courts suspended ballot counting (over a week ago), he did not say why. Among the reasons, it violates a State Constitution requirement that amendments only address a single issue. This amendment does not.

Anyone answering those relevant questions would have mentioned that.

[xoxoxoBruce]

Originally Posted by tw

If you cannot answer the question, then why are you posting? Griff and I have both asked for your thoughts.

No, you did not ask for our thoughts, you asked

So who is doing all the pushing? ~snip~ Who is pushing all this? And why? What really is the objective? What really is the problem that must be solved?

Whereas xoxoxoBruce noted the Courts suspended ballot counting (over a week ago), he did not say why.

That's right, instead I gave you the link so you could read the decision and the dissent for yourself. The ACLU said because it was invalid because it covered more than one issue, but three of the seven Judges disagreed.

The reason for it is because a CA tech Billionaire had a sister murdered by an ex-boyfriend who was arrested. A week later the victim's (and Billionaire's) mother ran into the murderer in the grocery store. So the rich dude is funding this law in every state.