Marsy's Law

[tw]

Originally Posted by sexobon

He just isn't the crazy old coot he used to be, now being a mere shadow of his former self.

Crazy because you were constantly exposed for believing extremist rhetoric?

And again you demean rather than address the topic - as all good extremist are taught to do by The Don. The relevant questions still ignored: Who is pushing all this? And why? What really is the objective? What really is the problem that must be solved? All still ignored - because that is what extremists do - alongside their good friend Mayhem.

[sexobon]

You're too underdeveloped to do the research yourself and need someone to feed information to you like they're feeding a baby. We're not going to babysit you no matter how much you cry. As an adult who still acts like a baby, you can learn to do the research yourself; or, do without.

[Gravdigr]

[xoxoxoBruce]

Poor tw believed his father was the smartest guy in the world so tw swallowed all the madmen bullshit the old man spouted.
That's why he's so delusional, poor boy.

[tw]

The relevant questions still ignored: Who is pushing all this? And why? What really is the objective? What really is the problem that must be solved? All still ignored - because that is what extremists do - "wreck shit". Not one honest answer.

[henry quirk]

Originally Posted by tw

The relevant questions still ignored: Who is pushing all this? And why? What really is the objective? What really is the problem that must be solved? All still ignored - because that is what extremists do - "wreck shit". Not one honest answer.

If you give a damn enough to post in-thread, go the extra inch and google 'marsy's law' then you'll find out 'who', 'what', 'why', etc.

That's what I did. What I found is the reason I posted what I posted up-thread.

[glatt]

Originally Posted by tw

All still ignored - because that is what extremists do - "wreck shit". Not one honest answer.

What makes you think any of us knows the answer?

Griff came here asking our thoughts. We speak English and could read the text of law and gave our thoughts.

Sure. It would be interesting to know who is behind the push for the law. Why don't you go find out and come back and tell us instead of insulting everyone?

[sexobon]

Originally Posted by tw

The relevant questions still ignored: Who is pushing all this? And why? What really is the objective? What really is the problem that must be solved? All still ignored - because that is what extremists do - "wreck shit". Not one honest answer.

You failed to post your credit card information. From now on you'll be charged for these services you moocher.

mooch·er

A person who lives off others without giving anything in return.

[Urbane Guerrilla]

Originally Posted by xoxoxoBruce

Poor tw believed his father was the smartest guy in the world so tw swallowed all the madmen bullshit the old man spouted.
That's why he's so delusional, poor boy.

This is the first I've heard of tw having... family. The very first.

[fargon]

It Just Doesn't Matter!!!
We're all FUCKED!!!
So just be nice to each other for a change.

[Urbane Guerrilla]

Tw clearly placed second in the blockhead contest, aye.

He seems composed entirely of an antisocial, let alone anti-American, perfidy. We have, after all, absolutely *no* notion of what tw is *for,* though we have a lot of testimony on what he's against. In this his life's thought strongly resembles Fascism, which had the same trouble expressing what it was for, being explicit only about what it was against.

Bad company to keep, I'd say.

His hobby is mouthing off about how all things and all circumstances betray and offend tw. By design. Even the weather -- perhaps the Ice Ages. I suppose everyone can do with a hobby...

But if tw actually wants to be treated like a human being, he's going to have to abandon this, remaking his whole self, and not dying in his current mode. (Did he ever in life have another, or was he a crabby sour tween too?) His comprehensive hatreds suggest in turn that tw hates himself most and chiefest of all. Lacks amour-propre, and is very bitter for this lack. Counseling alone may not be enough to repair him; psychoactive drugs may also be called for.

[tw]

Originally Posted by Urbane Guerrilla

His hobby is mouthing off about how all things and all circumstances betray and offend tw.

Replies are always based in facts that expose / challenge emotions in so many conclusions. Cited repeatedly is how easily some only use emotions to know something. Saddam's WMDs are a classic example. Mission Accomplished, that resulted, was also based in lies justified by emotions. And the resulting disaster - ignoring phase four planning - was but another perfect example of the emotional - challenged by facts even defined by SzeTzu over 2500 years ago.

Even The Don was elected only because he lies and insults people. That appeals to the emotional.

We went through same with a book on strategic objectives in military strategy. You only read the first chapter and gave up. It was too complicated. And therefore did not realize, so well defined in that book, why America would have to return and fight that war all over again - resulting in most of the 5000 Americans uselessly killed there.

But that is too long for an emotional person who needs everything explained in a soundbyte - a 140 character post.

So you attack the messenger rather than address the topic. Learning reality from so many paragraphs is too hard. Better is to wait for the Central Committee to say what to believe. And that, sir, has always been why we will constantly disagree. I do not wait to be brainwashed by extremist talk show hosts.

Meanwhile, xoxoxBruce has finally attempted to answer one of the questions.

The reason for it is because a CA tech Billionaire had a sister murdered by an ex-boyfriend who was arrested. A week later ...

The billionaire is a founder of Broadcom. If I remember (from so long ago), his name is Nicholos. His objective is to get a Constitutional Amendment at the Federal level by first getting it implemented in many states.

His objectives are admirable. But the laws (amendments) that he is promoting are too vague, too broad, and too easily used to subvert personal rights. At least that is the analysis by some who use reason to make conclusions. These concepts and principles have been too little discussed to justify and sudden legal change.

It is currently promoted using the same 'we don't need to learn' attitude that justified changing Daylight Savings Time.

The proposal has pros and cons. Both would be discussed by moderates. Unfortunately a citation by sexobon demonstrates a one sided opinion. It does not discuss both pros and cons. And is therefore best ignored as if written by an extremist.

What then follows are so many personal attacks that never answer the questions: Who is pushing all this? And why? What really is the objective? What really is the problem that must be solved?

One can only conclude that most have opinions but could not even answer those simple questions. And that was the purpose of those questions. Separate moderates (who learn facts before having opinions) from extremists (who make conclusions from and justify their attacks only using emotion).

Not surprising, so many cheapshots came from the usual suspects - who refused to answer any of those questions. Apparently because they could not.

Curious is why UG did not immediately join in the usual personal attacks. That is expected from people who only want to 'wreck shit'.

Since this is so long, I expect the usual disparaging comments devoid of any honest discussion. And find it curious that neither moderates nor progressives post in these discussions anymore.

[henry quirk]

I was cryptic, not uninformed.

[Urbane Guerrilla]

Originally Posted by tw

Curious is why UG did not immediately join in the usual personal attacks. That is expected from people who only want to 'wreck shit'.

It is simply accounted for: you do not have an accurate understanding of me, and you never will -- as an exertion of the emotional thinking you have always denied on the one hand yet always evidence on the other. You own the emotional thinking, and it is yours in perpetuity. You desperately want my character to be as low as your own. I'm not sorry to inform you that I have more self-respect than that.

You are completely summed up by your bitternesses and prejudices and idées fixes. None here think of you as anything but a piñata. You demand that the world offend and injure you. Sure enough... compliance happens, happened, will further happen.

You'll die alone. Having voted Democratic one last time.

[sexobon]

Originally Posted by tw

… Unfortunately a citation by sexobon demonstrates a one sided opinion. It does not discuss both pros and cons. And is therefore best ignored as if written by an extremist. ...

My citation comes from the ACLU. The PA. ACLU's position on the matter prevailed and the PA. Supreme Court ruled that Marsy’s Law votes won’t be counted.

The citation was also part of a linked article that gave background information for those willing to do their own research.

Sexobon cites winners. Tw cries with losers.