![]() |
|
Current Events Help understand the world by talking about things happening in it |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 |
still says videotape
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 26,813
|
I would suggest that if you are going to have these arguments learn basic facts so the other side doesn't derail your arguments. It is a common tactic used when control advocates use sloppy terminology like "assault rifle". My rifle shoots a larger round than the AR-15. It is meant to kill large game with one round. The heavy kick is a reminder of the seriousness of what I'm engaged in. Learn about the weapons and focus on what you (and many of us) believe makes them inappropriate for civilian use like semi-automatic fire, high capacity magazines, and ammunition appropriate for war and targets but not for big game hunting.
__________________
If you would only recognize that life is hard, things would be so much easier for you. - Louis D. Brandeis |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
I love it when a plan comes together.
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 9,793
|
Quote:
Allow me to demonstrate how important this is: [Rhetorical] What is the purpose of military small arms and ammunition? [Paraphrasing] XoB says it's to wound and thereby further burden the opposition with caring for the wounded. [Paraphrasing] Tw says it's only to kill. The purpose of military small arms and ammunition is to incapacitate, to render someone who was a combatant a noncombatant, whether they live or die is secondary. This is evidenced by the Laws of Land Warfare. If you shoot and wound an opponent; but, they continue hostilities, you can legally continue to shoot them until they cease hostilities even if it kills them. Wounding is not the primary objective. If you shoot and wound an opponent who then ceases hostilities, you cannot legally continue to shoot them until you have killed them. Killing is not the primary objective. Military small arms and ammunition are designed around incapacitation in adherence with the Laws of Land Warfare and reflected in their tradeoffs in lethality for other considerations (e.g. non-maiming ammunition). There's been many a soldier who's wished that their small arms were designed only to kill; but, that's not the way it is in reality. There are rare exceptions for elite military units that have narrowly defined missions which require the assured instant incapacitation that killing an opponent provides. They use specialized firearms and ammunition. US policy and the international agreements to which we're signatory prohibit designing military small arms and ammunition only for killing; unless, there's a consensus that a specific situation falls outside the parameters of conventional warfare. Claims that military small arms and ammunition are designed only for killing are categorically discredited; but, that doesn't stop the ignorant from making those claims nor does it stop whacko leftist extremist propagandists from preying on the ignorant who can't be bothered to learn facts. As Griff said, learn basic facts. It will help keep those like tw from preying on you for their own self aggrandizement. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Read? I only know how to write.
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 11,933
|
Quote:
Military weapons are designed to kill people - despite those silly denials. Killing is their purpose. Those large caliber rounds fired from large magazines on semi and fully automatic weapons are not useful (ie have no purpose in hunting). Those are only widely available because the NRA's purpose is to increase industry profits. What was this week's mass murder? I don't need no stink'in airline ticket. I have an AR-15. Next stop: Cuba. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|