The Cellar  

Go Back   The Cellar > Main > Current Events

Current Events Help understand the world by talking about things happening in it

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-11-2010, 09:32 AM   #1
glatt
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 27,717
Quote:
Originally Posted by aliasyzy View Post

the data of these two charts are from World Resources Institute
now is 2010, but it won't change a lot on the shape of these two charts.
It will change them both significantly. China has passed the US in total emissions. Not that the US has anything to brag about.
glatt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2010, 09:47 AM   #2
aliasyzy
Soylent Greenhorn
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 25
Quote:
Originally Posted by glatt View Post
It will change them both significantly. China has passed the US in total emissions. Not that the US has anything to brag about.
for the first chart, it won't change significantly, because the stock is too large for the new increase to change it.

for the second chart, in the link you give, US 18.67 ton per capita, China 4.57 ton per capita (less than 1/4 of US), still doesn't change significantly
aliasyzy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2010, 10:20 AM   #3
classicman
barely disguised asshole, keeper of all that is holy.
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 23,401
[quote=aliasyzy;625587]
Quote:
It's a common sense in the world that US is the first to blame for the global warming,
Oh Please, The US is the first to be blamed for all the ills of the world. We do more for every other nation on this planet - bar none. And we get a lot of shit for it. I'd be interested to know what would happen if we just said "Fuck you" to all these countries that need us to finance just about everything. I wonder...

Do the Chinese have the right to ship their polluted and poisonous products all over the world?

A little money? Are you kidding me? You talk about biased sources - Whew. Look at your own. Seems to me you're an apologist for China.

Quote:
Who wrecked the Copenhagen deal? Use your brain instead of swallow those propaganda and prejudices!
There are a lot more sources who blame China than the US.

I think it may be you who is swallowing a great deal of propaganda.
__________________
"like strapping a pillow on a bull in a china shop" Bullitt
classicman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2010, 11:07 AM   #4
aliasyzy
Soylent Greenhorn
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 25
[quote=classicman;625612]
Quote:
Originally Posted by aliasyzy View Post

There are a lot more sources who blame China than the US.

I think it may be you who is swallowing a great deal of propaganda.
It's simply because US is No.1 in propaganda/PR as well as in its military power. And people always tend to say and believe what benefits them most.

I have to go to sleep, it's midnight in China. Good day.

BTW: Chinese Government propagandas but it's very poor at this sophisticated skill, so i don't think i will swallow any of it.
aliasyzy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2010, 10:48 AM   #5
jinx
Come on, cat.
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: general vicinity of Philadelphia area
Posts: 7,013
Well, is emitting huge amounts a bad idea or isn't it?
__________________
Crying won't help you, praying won't do you no good.
jinx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2010, 10:50 AM   #6
Shawnee123
Why, you're a regular Alfred E Einstein, ain't ya?
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 21,206
You can't put too much water in a nuclear reactor.
__________________
A word to the wise ain't necessary - it's the stupid ones who need the advice.
--Bill Cosby
Shawnee123 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2010, 10:58 AM   #7
glatt
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 27,717
Quote:
Originally Posted by aliasyzy View Post
[the USA] remains the first place in terms of emission per capita
Wrong. According to the info at Wikipedia, Australia is in 1st place per capita. Jinx pointed that out a couple posts above this one. And China is in first place overall.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Shawnee123 View Post
You can't put too much water in a nuclear reactor.
Haggis
glatt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2010, 11:10 AM   #8
aliasyzy
Soylent Greenhorn
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 25
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shawnee123 View Post
You can't put too much water in a nuclear reactor.
then American people could be a role-model for other developed and developing countries first and lower your material life quality to 1/2 or even less?
aliasyzy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2010, 09:14 AM   #9
TheMercenary
“Hypocrisy: prejudice with a halo”
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Savannah, Georgia
Posts: 21,393
Quote:
Originally Posted by aliasyzy View Post
then American people could be a role-model for other developed and developing countries first and lower your material life quality to 1/2 or even less?
Yea but then China would go bankrupt. So would Walmart.
__________________
Anyone but the this most fuked up President in History in 2012!
TheMercenary is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2010, 11:09 AM   #10
Shawnee123
Why, you're a regular Alfred E Einstein, ain't ya?
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 21,206
yeah, but when it comes to dangerous metals in children's toys, YOU GUYS ARE DA MAN! Woot woot!
__________________
A word to the wise ain't necessary - it's the stupid ones who need the advice.
--Bill Cosby
Shawnee123 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2010, 11:13 AM   #11
aliasyzy
Soylent Greenhorn
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 25
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shawnee123 View Post
yeah, but when it comes to dangerous metals in children's toys, YOU GUYS ARE DA MAN! Woot woot!
don't be happy too soon. I just don't have time to answer each and every of these nonsense. maybe weekend.

gotta go to sleep, bye
aliasyzy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2013, 10:55 PM   #12
gvidas
Hoodoo Guru
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 286
That's eerie, I just finished reading that article not 2 minutes ago.

The presentation is phenomenal. It really nicely integrates short looped video, still photographs, and stellar writing. I knew nothing about the region or its politics before I started reading, and now feel much more informed than I did an hour ago.

Usually in order to read any dense geopolitical analysis I need a vested interest; apparently, flashy graphics will work in a pinch.
gvidas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2010, 11:20 AM   #13
classicman
barely disguised asshole, keeper of all that is holy.
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 23,401
Ok, Goodnight my Chinese Emma.
__________________
"like strapping a pillow on a bull in a china shop" Bullitt
classicman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2010, 11:28 AM   #14
Shawnee123
Why, you're a regular Alfred E Einstein, ain't ya?
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 21,206
Maybe they'll start manufacturing senses of humor.
__________________
A word to the wise ain't necessary - it's the stupid ones who need the advice.
--Bill Cosby
Shawnee123 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2010, 11:54 AM   #15
Undertoad
Radical Centrist
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Cottage of Prussia
Posts: 31,423
China took a primary role in scuttling Copenhagen, but one can hardly blame them. It was going to be scuttled somewhere. China is simply the party with the most to lose at this moment in time, and the most willing to take a hard stance.

We notice that Communism is a source of pollution. In the 80s, the worst-polluted rivers of the world were to be found in eastern Europe. Today, they are all found in eastern China. India is the exception to this rule, but of course India has its own societal problems.
Undertoad is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:21 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.