ACORN

[TheMercenary]

Bottom line is they are suspect organization who continue to be accused of many illegal wrong doings and they are not worthy of further funding from public funds.

Originally Posted by TheMercenary

Bottom line is they are suspect organization who continue to be accused of many illegal wrong doings and they are not worthy of further funding from public funds.

Bottom line is that is not how the system works....nor should it IMO.

We dont deny opportunities for federal funding to persons and/or organizations based on undocumented or unsubstantiated allegations and suspicions, even more so when for the most part, those allegations and suspicions are partisan in nature.

It would set a very dangerous precedent that could be used against organizations across the political spectrum in the future.

[Shawnee123]

Originally Posted by Shawnee123

Yabbut, my point is being "accused" of something means nothing. Look at all the stuff your boy Bush was "accused" of...the other party will always accuse, hoping something sticks.

Originally Posted by Redux

Bottom line is that is not how the system works....nor should it IMO.

We dont deny opportunities for federal funding to persons and/or organizations based on undocumented or unsubstantiated allegations and suspicions, even more so when for the most part, those allegations and suspicions are partisan in nature.

It would set a very dangerous precedent that could be used against organizations across the political spectrum in the future.

So I've heard.