![]() |
|
Politics Where we learn not to think less of others who don't share our views |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#11 | ||||
Person who doesn't update the user title
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Bottom lands of the Missoula floods
Posts: 6,402
|
Quote:
![]() Quote:
...what do you consider the Massachusetts' program under Romney? ...what do you consider the Oregon program under Kitzhabber ? ...there were probably several trial projects in other states earlier under federally approved variations of their own Medicare/Medicaid programs. Of course I've not yet seen an opponent of Obama that didn't consider every situation "not the right way to do it" or "not the right time to do it" Those are standard bullet points for the GOP. Quote:
every Congressman, but the overall plan was discussed for a long time, with central features being made aware to everyone. (You've listed a few in the paragraph below...) Quote:
The 85% rule is simply one tool to force the insurance companies and the health care providers to put their $ into delivery of care, not advertising or CEO salaries or high MD payments or ultra-high cost hardware ? I assume you are not opposed to all that; but if so, what are your reasons ? Tort reform doesn't belong in this ACA legislation for several reasons, Not only because it takes away the rights of patients to seek recourse in the face of what courts determine to be negligence or malpractice, but the health care insurer is not (usually) the same insurance carrier as the "malpractice insurance company" for the medical personnel. Tort reform did not fly previously, but it had little to do with the Democrats. It failed to be enacted due to the lawyers in the crowd... many of whom were Republicans. Last edited by Lamplighter; 09-21-2013 at 05:26 PM. |
||||
![]() |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|