![]() |
|
Current Events Help understand the world by talking about things happening in it |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#11 | |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
That is why they have staff...that is why there are committee structures and recognized experts in both parties who lead the initiatives and brief fellow party members on the details of legislation. For any piece of legislation, state or federal, there are probably only handful of people who have actually read the bill...and that would most likely be the staff who wrote it. I would bet very few of the AZ legislators in either party read the legislation. It is simply not how governing bodies work. In fact, it is not how most organizations work. And it doesnt apply just to legislation. Do you think a president should read every intel report cover-to-cover before making a decision....or rely on detailed briefings/recommendations from staff (the director of national intelligence)? In the private sector, do you think a CEO reads every report/recommendation directed to his/her attention? Delegation and division of labor recognizing particular expertise within the structure is the manner in which good organizations work most effectively. added: And in the legislative process, most bill amend existing laws and cant simply be read free-standing. The AZ bill may only be ten pages, but this is is at the heart of it. AMENDING TITLE 11, CHAPTER 7, ARIZONA REVISED STATUTES, BY ADDING ARTICLE 8;Reading a bill is not like reading a book or a magazine article. To fully understand it, one would have to read it in the context of all these existing statutes or sections of the state code that the bill amends at the same time as one reads the legislation. I can guarantee that very few legislators read it in such a manner. You may think it is pathetic. I think it is representative of good organizational management. Last edited by Redux; 05-24-2010 at 10:00 PM. |
|
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|