Ashcroft and Evans call it quits

Kitsune · 11-12-2004, 10:49 AM

Have we all gone insane? Torture is wrong. Period. The USA is not supposed to be one of the evil countries that tortures its prisoners.

The Geneva Convetions never made any sense to me. Listen: you are killing people in a war. You are resorting to the very last resort you have by throwing lives towards a cause, just or not, to kill other human beings. You are taking the lives of other people. And someone wanted to apply rules to this? I am reminded of the revolutionary war in which the British were shocked to find the opposing forces fought by using the dastardly tactic of hiding behind trees -- someone finally got it in their head that standing in a line, while considered heroic and fair, was fucking stupid. Or during the civil war when someone got the bright idea in their head to attack at night and take advantage of surprise to kill the enemy to save their own lives. Of course, at the time, none of this was considered honorable to do in battle and objection to it ran high but, honestly, why have rules to something so atrocious, anyways? You can paralyze a person with a bullet by shooting them in the spine, but mustard gas mames too much to be legal? You're welcome to use a genade to blow someone's limbs off, but use of fragmenting rifle rounds is off-limits? You can send someone home to their family in bag(s) but you can't kick the hell out of them to get them to talk? We're free to place sanctions on a country and starve their people into submission, but we have to feed prisoners we take? We certainly wouldn't want anyone to suffer during battle, would we?

Its war, people. We have enough missiles warmed and ready to obliterate the entire planet and doom all of humanity to a slow, painful, toxic death. Applying rules to it doesn't make any sense.

11-12-2004, 10:49 AM	#14
Kitsune still eats dirt Join Date: Sep 2003 Location: Tampa, FL Posts: 3,031	Have we all gone insane? Torture is wrong. Period. The USA is not supposed to be one of the evil countries that tortures its prisoners. The Geneva Convetions never made any sense to me. Listen: you are killing people in a war. You are resorting to the very last resort you have by throwing lives towards a cause, just or not, to kill other human beings. You are taking the lives of other people. And someone wanted to apply rules to this? I am reminded of the revolutionary war in which the British were shocked to find the opposing forces fought by using the dastardly tactic of hiding behind trees -- someone finally got it in their head that standing in a line, while considered heroic and fair, was fucking stupid. Or during the civil war when someone got the bright idea in their head to attack at night and take advantage of surprise to kill the enemy to save their own lives. Of course, at the time, none of this was considered honorable to do in battle and objection to it ran high but, honestly, why have rules to something so atrocious, anyways? You can paralyze a person with a bullet by shooting them in the spine, but mustard gas mames too much to be legal? You're welcome to use a genade to blow someone's limbs off, but use of fragmenting rifle rounds is off-limits? You can send someone home to their family in bag(s) but you can't kick the hell out of them to get them to talk? We're free to place sanctions on a country and starve their people into submission, but we have to feed prisoners we take? We certainly wouldn't want anyone to suffer during battle, would we? Its war, people. We have enough missiles warmed and ready to obliterate the entire planet and doom all of humanity to a slow, painful, toxic death. Applying rules to it doesn't make any sense.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)