Thread: Consider
View Single Post
Old 10-18-2011, 11:23 AM   #8
skysidhe
~~Life is either a daring adventure or nothing.~~
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 6,828
Quote:
Originally Posted by jimhelm View Post
Homeowners policy?
Quote:
Originally Posted by jimhelm View Post

Did this happen to you, sky!?

This happened at my sister's house. I suggested homeowners.

Quote:
Originally Posted by DanaC View Post
I gotta say: I don't really give a shit who started it. If my dog hurt another dog I'd want to help towards the cost of the vet.


This is my opinion, which has landed me into my first family feud ever.

Quote:
Originally Posted by footfootfoot View Post
As in Dog-sitting or as in observing?
Quote:
Originally Posted by footfootfoot View Post

IF the former then you are responsible for the dog you are watching. The smaller yippy dog, being your mother's and housemates dog also falls under your care unless you have a specific arrangement with your mother to the contrary.


Dog sitting. I came to this conclusion too, however the details are murky about how exactly a 10 year old barnacled poodle launched the attack.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Clodfobble View Post
How high of a vet bill are we talking about?



It’s not very high. $260. This is more about who is right and who is wrong, legally and according to me, ethically. It is very wrong to be treating an elderly woman the way they are, and her little poodle. You know how old ladies are about their poodles.

The vet said it was very close to the jugler. The poodle got huge staples to close it shut.



The owner of the dog paid half and my sister paid half. My sister wants her half back from my mother and lays the blame on the little dog. She has some infinite monkey going on, I think.

I take the stance that, if I had a large dog, I would pay because it's the right thing to do. I never imagined that THAT little comment would draw a battle line.

Bottom line. My mother isn't paying for the vet bill. I told my sis it was the big dogs owners responsibility and if she didn't want to make him pay, she could look into homeowners insurance.

She insists that my mother's dog is the instigator and should pay.

There is an inconsistency about what happened after my mother's poodle 'viciously' attacked the husky. My sister either pulled the little dog off ( not sure how you would pull a little dog out of the mouth of a large dog) or the big dog flung the poodle away after biting down on her neck, which implies no action was taken. That makes her negligent and responsible too.


skysidhe is offline   Reply With Quote