Quote:
Originally Posted by toranokaze
There is nothing wrong with the belief that God created man.
Also there are some problems with evolution and it seams that if one can not question the theory without being labeled as a fool.
|
There has
never been a theory that was taken to court or politicians before being accepted to classrooms.
It is an entirely organic process.
It is a trickle-down method.
A hypothesis is presented, or field-work is shown, lab work is done, peer-review is done to verify the work, the work is replicated and verified again, papers are published and reviewed, others repeat the work and review the original work. It begins to be taught at the PhD and graduate level, as it becomes accepted and the work is shown to be more and more accurate and lends itself to other work/fields it works its way all the way down to the elementary levels of schooling and texts... that is all.
All creationists/ID theorists have to do is present ANYTHING that does this and no one will question them.
Why are they going outside the science community to circumvent the entire process unless they have no valid claims, no valid theory?