View Single Post
Old 03-24-2007, 03:47 PM   #3
richlevy
King Of Wishful Thinking
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Philadelphia Suburbs
Posts: 6,669
Quote:
Originally Posted by sycamore View Post
Am I the only person that a) Doesn't see our pullout as necessarily a failure? and b) Doesn't really care if we "lost" anyway, because we're bound to lose a few battles?
Let's see. We "lost" Vietnam. Currently, Vietnam is a trading partner of the United States.

We have 58,000 names on the Vietnam War memorial. 30 years after the war we are buying tea and fish from our former enemies, the ones who 'won' the war.

Could we have stopped at 10,20,30,40,000 and gotten the same results? How many more would it have taken for us to 'win'?

I still see people interviewed who think if we had been willing to sustain more losses we could have won Vietnam. Many of them are people who never served there.

SO, the question becomes how many more dead and wounded for a 'win' in Iraq? What constitutes a win?
__________________
Exercise your rights and remember your obligations - VOTE!
I have always believed that hope is that stubborn thing inside us that insists, despite all the evidence to the contrary, that something better awaits us so long as we have the courage to keep reaching, to keep working, to keep fighting. -- Barack Hussein Obama
richlevy is offline   Reply With Quote