Tsunami Warning

BigV • Jun 15, 2005 12:00 am
http://wwwa.accuweather.com/watches-warnings.asp?partner=forecastfox&zipcode=98101&county=WAc033&zone=WAz007&metric=0

Do you have people on the west coast? Better call them and tell them this. Not a joke.

TO - TSUNAMI WARNING SYSTEM PARTICIPANTS IN
ALASKA/BRITISH COLUMBIA/WASHINGTON/OREGON/CALIFORNIA
FROM - WEST COAST AND ALASKA TSUNAMI WARNING CENTER/NOAA/NWS
SUBJECT - TSUNAMI WARNING BULLETIN - INITIAL
BULLETIN NUMBER 1
ISSUED 06/15/2005 AT 0256 UTC


EARTHQUAKE DATA
PRELIMINARY MAGNITUDE - 7.4
LOCATION - 41.3N 125.7W - 90 MILES NW OF EUREKA-CA.
300 MILES NW OF SAN FRANCISCO-CA.
TIME - 1851 ADT 06/14/2005
1951 PDT 06/14/2005
0251 UTC 06/15/2005

EVALUATION
IT IS NOT KNOWN - REPEAT NOT KNOWN - IF A TSUNAMI EXISTS BUT A
TSUNAMI MAY HAVE BEEN GENERATED. THEREFORE PERSONS IN LOW
LYING COASTAL AREAS SHOULD BE ALERT TO INSTRUCTIONS FROM THEIR
LOCAL EMERGENCY OFFICIALS. PERSONS ON THE BEACH SHOULD MOVE TO
HIGHER GROUND IF IN A WARNED AREA. TSUNAMIS MAY BE A SERIES OF
WAVES WHICH COULD BE DANGEROUS FOR SEVERAL HOURS AFTER THE
INITIAL WAVE ARRIVAL.
BigV • Jun 15, 2005 12:23 am
EARTHQUAKE DATA
PRELIMINARY MAGNITUDE - 7.4
LOCATION - 41.4N 125.6W - 85 MILES NW OF EUREKA-CA.
300 MILES NW OF SAN FRANCISCO-CA.
TIME - 1851 ADT 06/14/2005
1951 PDT 06/14/2005
0251 UTC 06/15/2005

A SMALL TSUNAMI WAS OBSERVED AT THE FOLLOWING SITES
WATER LEVELS REMAIN NORMAL AT ALL COASTAL SITES. NO WAVE
BEEN DETECTED.

EVALUATION
NO TSUNAMI DANGER EXISTS FOR ALASKA - BRITISH COLUMBIA -
WASHINGTON - OREGON OR CALIFORNIA. HOWEVER SOME AREAS MAY
EXPERIENCE SMALL SEA LEVEL CHANGES. AS LOCAL CONDITIONS
CAN CAUSE A WIDE VARIATION IN TSUNAMI WAVE ACTION THE ALL
CLEAR DETERMINATIONS MUST BE MADE BY LOCAL AUTHORITIES.


Whew! So far, so good.
lookout123 • Jun 15, 2005 12:39 am
you have got to be effing kidding me. my sister leaves Korea to spend Christmas in Phuket, Thailand - Tsunami crushes hotel. my sister is currently in the air between Korea and LA and... Tsunami? she has to learn to stay at home i guess.
wolf • Jun 15, 2005 1:20 am
This is God's punishment for the Michael Jackson Verdict.
lookout123 • Jun 15, 2005 1:48 am
ok Pat or Jimmy or Jerry or whoever.
BigV • Jun 15, 2005 2:03 am
lookout123 wrote:
ok Pat or Jimmy or Jerry or whoever.

:eyebrow: :question: :headscratch:
wolf • Jun 15, 2005 2:08 am
He thinks I'm channelling a televangelist.
plthijinx • Jun 15, 2005 2:11 am
i thought they have bouys out there to detect the magnatude of the tsunami's.....anyway, there have been a few quakes in the last few days......wonder if a big one is brewing in the near future.....?
BigV • Jun 15, 2005 2:14 am
plthijinx wrote:
i thought they have bouys out there to detect the magnatude of the tsunami's.....anyway, there have been a few quakes in the last few days......wonder if a big one is brewing in the near future.....?
Yer from Texas, right? Well, even in California 7.4 qualifies as a big earthquake. Albeit, it was offshore, but still, that's a helluva 30 second (thirty SECOND. dangit, learn to type, or at least read, will ya?) ride.
Queen of the Ryche • Jun 15, 2005 5:27 pm
The bouys are up in Alaska, the quakes were in Palm Springs Sunday, Bering Sea Monday, and last night off the coast of Nothern Cali - it was a strike slip quake, so the surface level of the ocean floor did not shift, hence no tsunami. The warning came on the TV around 8 last night and was over by 9. Sorry folks - nothing to see, show's over. Move along.
Dr. Zaius • Jun 15, 2005 9:12 pm
Some idiots where I live actually started travelling toward the coast when they heard the news. Probably going for the Darwin Award. :headshake
Elspode • Jun 16, 2005 1:08 pm
If we could get enough of those types down there along the shore, they could function as human sandbags and protect the rest of us while taking themselves out of the gene pool and society in general.

Win-win!
BigV • Jun 16, 2005 6:16 pm
Moderate earthquake shakes Los Angeles area
Thu Jun 16, 2005 05:32 PM ET


and again.
tw • Jun 16, 2005 11:23 pm
News reporters should first learn the perspective of numbers before hyping a news stories about an LA quake. If one earthquake was in British Columbia and another was on the CA/OR border, then both would never be reported. But two earthquakes even farther apart are reported only because both distant locations share a political boundary - CA.

Meanwhile, so many other earthquakes only prove god is angry about the sinful land of pornography, silicon breasts, and innovation. Listed are the size and location of so many earthquakes that clearly proves to any religious extremist that the end is near; Christ will rise again. An NBC network TV show even proves it:

[code]16 Jun 2005
4.9 GREATER LOS ANGELES AREA, CA.
4.8 EASTER ISLAND REGION
4.8 NORTHERN SUMATRA, INDONESIA
3.9 OFF COAST OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA
3.5 CENTRAL CALIFORNIA
5.1 NORTH OF SVALBARD
4.7 CENTRAL EAST PACIFIC RISE
3.6 OFFSHORE NORTHERN CALIFORNIA

15 Jun 2005
6.5 OFF COAST OF AISEN, CHILE
4.6 TARAPACA, CHILE
5.4 VOLCANO ISLANDS, JAPAN REGION
4.5 POTOSI, BOLIVIA
4.0 TARAPACA, CHILE
5.2 SOUTH SANDWICH ISLANDS REGION
6.3 NEW IRELAND REGION, PAPUA NEW GUINEA
5.0 VOLCANO ISLANDS, JAPAN REGION
4.7 OFF THE COAST OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA
4.7 OFF THE COAST OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA
5.2 SAMOA ISLANDS REGION
3.9 NORTHERN CALIFORNIA
7.2 OFF THE COAST OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA [/code]
lookout123 • Jun 17, 2005 1:33 am
Christ will rise again


actually i'm pretty sure most Christians believe that Christ is already risen, and i'm not aware of a second crucifixion, so i don't think there is technically any reason for Him to rise again.

i'm just sayin'.
Queen of the Ryche • Jun 17, 2005 11:12 am
And if that were the case, I didn't realize that people in Japan and New Guinea and OFF THE COAST (evil fish with their big boobs and their porn mags) were such big sinners. Good thing I'm not a Christian, or I'd be doomed to Hell, or fall right of the coast of Cali.

Actually, if I've heard it right, all of these little quakes relieve pressure along the fault lines (one triggers the next, hence the groupings within a few days, like it has always been) reducing the possibilty of "The Big One" I've been hearing about for the past thirty seven freakin' years of my life.