Undertoad • Jun 6, 2005 3:52 pm

xob writes, "The recent discussion about the beating children take in a war made me think this picture of us sending children to war was quite poignant."
Yessir, I do agree.

Thousands of children were directly involved in the Civil War. Older boys served as soldiers. Many younger boys were also invoved, some boys as young as 11 years old. The younger boys generlly served as drummer or buggle boys. Commonly the drummer and buggle boys were 13-15 years of age.
Beyond the use of very young boys as deummer boys and buggle boys, about 1 million boys 17 years of age and under fought with the Federal Army alone. Almost surely very large numbers of similarly aged boys fought with the Conderacy, although actual records are less available.Of course, 150 years ago getting married at 16 as more common and 40 was old. :)
Not that most of the soldiers actually aimed at specific targets.Troubleshooter wrote:It was considered very bad form to shoot any of those.
Many younger boys were also invoved, some boys as young as 11 years old. The younger boys generlly served as drummer or buggle boys. Commonly the drummer and buggle boys were 13-15 years of age.
When life was simpler, but not easier and there was no compulsory education at what age does a boy become a man and a what age would a youth be deemed to be self-sufficient? In some “primitive” societies boys become men at 12-ish and go through a right of passage and live in the men’s hut.When my father was 12,(1930) he was unloading 150lb bales of hemp from railroad cars for a rope mill.
We Support Our Troops!!...Acme Prosthetics Inc. <!-- / sig -->Bet they don't get many law suits. Plaintiffs wouldn't have a leg to stand on.:lol: