3/2/2005: Topless aboriginals greet Prince Charles

Undertoad • Mar 2, 2005 8:40 pm
Image

Charles is on a tour of the outback of Australia, and was greeted there by traditional topless dancers. It occurs to me that this is another take on the breastfeeding theme that has been IotD since the Chavez pic last week and yesterday's suckling monkey.
full story
richlevy • Mar 2, 2005 9:01 pm
Ok, can someone tell me where his eyes are looking?
Griff • Mar 2, 2005 9:03 pm
I'm still scratching for a wise comment involving Camilla...
tw • Mar 2, 2005 9:17 pm
Why is this picture any more shocking than another with Charles sitting next to Camilla wearing a skirt? More silly sexual stereotypes based upon (gasp!) religious bias. It’s a tit. So what? He wears a skirt. Who cares?

Some are so aghast. That bias is what makes this picture relevant. Oh my god! A wardrobe malfunction! FCC fines the Cellar. What next? Woman exposes herself for some beads in New Orleans. How sinful.
xoxoxoBruce • Mar 2, 2005 9:28 pm
Gosh, it's a National Geographic moment. :king:
Wombat • Mar 2, 2005 9:39 pm
richlevy wrote:
Ok, can someone tell me where his eyes are looking?

At her eyes, which is normal for a conversation.

This isn't the first time Charley (or the queen, or other royals) has met people in traditional dress or traditional undress. To me this just isn't news.

What I do find incongruous is that the white guy's mom (who lives on the other side of the planet!) is the black women's head of state.
Trilby • Mar 2, 2005 9:48 pm
OMG--tw made total f****** sense! AND wasn't tedious about it!!!!!
The world as I know it continually evolves...and rightly so.
zippyt • Mar 2, 2005 10:43 pm
He is looking at the younger girls in the second row !!
404Error • Mar 3, 2005 3:47 am
xoxoxoBruce wrote:
Gosh, it's a National Geographic moment. :king:


To think, as a youngster I used to live for pictures like this in NG. ;)
Kellio • Mar 3, 2005 9:14 am
Oddly still, why are women in America shunned for exposing a breast, even if it is a drunken act or feeding of a child.. baffles me how intriguing our country has become..

*sigh*
smithgr • Mar 3, 2005 11:15 am
Maybe it's because our country was founded by a bunch of puritanical, permanently uptight, sexually repressed, sticks in the mud. A tradition continued to this day by religious conservatives (to whom POTUS is beholden) and the FCC.

I'd much rather the U.S. had been a country founded as a prison colony like Australia. We'd have a lot more fun.
Clodfobble • Mar 3, 2005 11:24 am
Well, Georgia was at least.
YellowBolt • Mar 3, 2005 12:34 pm
smithgr wrote:
Maybe it's because our country was founded by a bunch of puritanical, permanently uptight, sexually repressed, sticks in the mud.

That's not entirely true. The Puritans thought that sex was necessary under the Bible. So they had a lot of it.
BigV • Mar 3, 2005 12:45 pm
Griff wrote:
I'm still scratching for a wise comment involving Camilla...
It takes a visual comparison like this to make him appreciate Camilla after Diana.
Trilby • Mar 3, 2005 1:14 pm
YellowBolt wrote:
That's not entirely true. The Puritans thought that sex was necessary under the Bible. So they had a lot of it.


But only in the Biblically sanctioned way---Missionary style!
cjjulie • Mar 3, 2005 2:23 pm
'Oh mummy no, not those haalf naked women again' he says whinig. 'Well this time I am NOT going to shake there hands, you never know where they were last' :p
OnyxCougar • Mar 6, 2005 6:14 pm
Brianna wrote:
OMG--tw made total f****** sense! AND wasn't tedious about it!!!!!
The world as I know it continually evolves...and rightly so.


I'm telling you, his password has been compromised.
Nightsong • Mar 8, 2005 3:17 am
What a total boob. I mean Charles ofcourse. The breast are nice though. Speaking as a decendant of those stuck up sticks in the mud I must say I am glad the family developed a depravity very quickly. Ofcourse I have an Irish immigrant Grandfather who sired 23 children. Damned Catholic took that be fruitful thing to heart.
Wombat • Mar 8, 2005 7:58 pm
What is it with Charles? Not content with Australian tits, he has to get an eyeful of New Zealand norks too!

Image

NZ protester flashes her issues at Prince Charles

A woman has been led away by police after she bared her breasts at Prince Charles as part of an anti-royalist protest in which he was called a parasite during his visit to New Zealand's capital, Wellington.

...

The topless protester, who identified herself as Hannah Plant, 23, was standing on a wall outside the city library when she removed her shirt, exposing her bare breasts and shouting "shame on colonisation".

The message, "Get your colony shame off my breasts", was scrawled over her chest.

As she was led away by police, Prince Charles appeared unfazed.


http://www.abc.net.au/news/newsitems/200503/s1318618.htm
Undertoad • Mar 8, 2005 8:18 pm
Image

via Yahoo! Most Popular France
xoxoxoBruce • Mar 8, 2005 9:04 pm
It said, "Get your [SIZE=5]OO[/SIZE] colony shame off my breasts"? :apimp:
wolf • Mar 9, 2005 4:01 pm
She's frighteningly lopsided, isn't she?

Bears (tee hee) some simliarty to the Abos, though. Less perky than I ordinarily expect of a 23 year old.