This is porn.

perth • Nov 10, 2004 11:09 pm
Much better than that other thread, this actually IS porn. So don't go clicking on it at work.

Credit Kitsune with the idea for this thread, I only wish it was mine.

http://www.kindgirls.com/index2.php (NSFW!)
Elspode • Nov 11, 2004 12:13 am
Well, I have two things to say about this:

1) The thread title is a definite case of truth in advertising.
2) This is definitely the correct forum for this thread.
SteveDallas • Nov 11, 2004 1:07 am
I'm now officially blind.
lumberjim • Nov 11, 2004 1:13 am
I had almost mistaken this thread for a mind numbing blair witch treasure hunt, but I'm glad I caught the lack of the word 'not'.
Very classy porn, Perth. it speaks of your demeanor. I'd wager that you'd subscribe to, or buy Playboy before Penthouse.
wolf • Nov 11, 2004 1:57 am
I can now say that I have really seen everything

My Humble Contribution.
alphageek31337 • Nov 11, 2004 3:42 am
Hell, let's make it a pornography best-of:

http://www.sublimedirectory.com

http://www.p-bot.com (movies....yeah)
jaguar • Nov 11, 2004 4:06 am
Suicidegirls
perth • Nov 11, 2004 12:57 pm
Elspode wrote:
2) This is definitely the correct forum for this thread.

Yeah, I was gonna put it in the Internet forum, next to that other thread, but I did feel Entertainment was a better place for it. Thanks for noticing. :)
lumberjim wrote:
I'd wager that you'd subscribe to, or buy Playboy before Penthouse.

If I were to pay for porn, and I don't (only because so much of it is free), Playboy would be the way to go. For the articles. :rolleyes:
flippant • Nov 11, 2004 5:38 pm
:eek: I thought you were joking....
Kitsune • Nov 11, 2004 5:52 pm
Wow -- someone did start the thread! Thank you, God-- err, I mean, Perth!
Bullitt • Nov 11, 2004 8:19 pm
I dunno, I think God did a damn fine job in designing women :biggrin:
xoxoxoBruce • Nov 11, 2004 9:50 pm
Bullitt wrote:
I dunno, I think God did a damn fine job in designing women :biggrin:
And more men ride them than ride Harleys. :)

http://domai.com/ Not porn but NSFW.
Cain • Nov 11, 2004 10:01 pm
To compliment kindgirls - badgirls

Also, I'll throw in Coolios for good measure.

ah what the hell:
http://www.nsfw.web-log.nl/
http://www.downloadingpornwithdavo.com/
http://www.canal96.net/

:fumette:
footfootfoot • Nov 11, 2004 10:30 pm
SteveDallas wrote:
I'm now officially blind.


Thanks Steve, I've now officially laughed crackers through my nose.

lumberjim wrote:
I had almost mistaken this thread for a mind numbing blair witch treasure hunt, but I'm glad I caught the lack of the word 'not'.
Very classy porn, Perth. it speaks of your demeanor. I'd wager that you'd subscribe to, or buy Playboy before Penthouse.


I went to the site but I couldn't find the articles :D

xoxoxoBruce wrote:
And more men ride them than ride Harleys. :)


Thanks Bruce, crackers through the nose definitely call for a beer chaser through the nose :eek:


In closing, I'm so glad this wasn't one of those pr0n sites.
footfootfoot • Nov 11, 2004 10:35 pm
Oh yeah, one of the plus sides to being your own boss is that this is safe for work.
The negative side to being your own boss is that the boss can be an asshole.
slang • Nov 12, 2004 1:09 am
perth wrote:
.........this actually IS porn. (NSFW!)



Really!? Where's the sheep?
perth • Nov 12, 2004 10:01 am
Well, I thought you were supposed to bring them.
slang • Nov 12, 2004 5:25 pm
They're "busy" right now.
Cyber Wolf • Nov 12, 2004 5:36 pm
Too much cheesecake in here. Need more beefcake. Guys, you've been warned, but if you can handle it (pun sort of intended), there's a little bit of cheesecake on other parts of this site. Seriously though, there are some good vintage nude shots here. Clean and beautiful.
jinx • Nov 12, 2004 6:33 pm
Cyber Wolf wrote:
Too much cheesecake in here. Need more beefcake.

I don't know what it says about my sexuality, but I have no interest in looking at nekkid men. Nothing offensive about it or anything, just kinda silly... men 'Vogueing" with their dangly bits showing... not sexy. Now, if they were doing the dishes or cleaning the basement, that might do it for me.
xoxoxoBruce • Nov 12, 2004 9:58 pm
Strip her naked. :blush:
lumberjim • Nov 13, 2004 12:13 am
ewe....
Cyber Wolf • Nov 13, 2004 12:27 am
jinx wrote:
I don't know what it says about my sexuality, but I have no interest in looking at nekkid men. Nothing offensive about it or anything, just kinda silly... men 'Vogueing" with their dangly bits showing... not sexy. Now, if they were doing the dishes or cleaning the basement, that might do it for me.

Then that site's just not for you. To each her own.
zippyt • Nov 13, 2004 12:29 am
Oh COME ON LJ ,,,,, You can do better than THAT !!!
wolf • Nov 13, 2004 1:13 am
Cyber Wolf wrote:
Need more beefcake.


Some of my enjoyment is dampened by the fact that in most 'vintage' nude photos of men, they aren't, ummm .... happy. I also have a suspicion that 90%+ of said models are gay. Turn off.
Bullitt • Nov 13, 2004 1:53 am
zippyt wrote:
Oh COME ON LJ ,,,,, You can do better than THAT !!!


I dunno, anything that makes mountain dew go through my nose can be deemed a good comment.

oooh the burn!
breakingnews • Nov 13, 2004 9:33 am
wolf wrote:
Some of my enjoyment is dampened by the fact that in most 'vintage' nude photos of men, they aren't, ummm .... happy. I also have a suspicion that 90%+ of said models are gay. Turn off.


Actually, I was watching a documentary on porn stars, and apparently a straight male is a rarity in the adult entertainment industry. Now if I could magically add like 3-5 inches down below, having sex all day (for pay!) doesn't sound like such a bad idea ... better than the crappy grind I go through these days.
BrianR • Nov 13, 2004 9:57 am
It ain't all it's cracked up to be, take it from me.
slang • Nov 13, 2004 10:02 am
breakingnews wrote:
I was watching a documentary on porn stars......


Not to be a wiseass here BN, but a documentary? That sounds a bit strange.
wolf • Nov 13, 2004 3:41 pm
Frontline did one a while back ...
Cyber Wolf • Nov 15, 2004 9:47 pm
wolf wrote:
Some of my enjoyment is dampened by the fact that in most 'vintage' nude photos of men, they aren't, ummm .... happy. I also have a suspicion that 90%+ of said models are gay. Turn off.


Why should it matter what their orientation is if all you plan to do is look? Some of them look damn sexy, whatever their prefered partners are.
elSicomoro • Nov 15, 2004 9:56 pm
xoxoxoBruce wrote:
Strip her naked.


Ya know...the guy in that photo kinda looks like UT.
alphageek31337 • Nov 16, 2004 4:26 pm
wolf wrote:
Frontline did one a while back ...



My personal favorite porn-u-mentary is still Porn Star: The Legend of Ron Jeremy. Hooray for the Hedgehog!
xoxoxoBruce • Nov 16, 2004 7:27 pm
sycamore wrote:
Ya know...the guy in that photo kinda looks like UT.
Well, I stopped by one day and heard this strange buzzing from his garage, so I ope............ :blush:
Bullitt • Nov 17, 2004 2:59 am
I don't go here for the porn, just some of the crazy videos (ex: heat seeking missling shooting down a plane). But its NSFW anyhow sooo enjoy: Stile Project
wolf • Nov 18, 2004 1:26 am
Cyber Wolf wrote:
Why should it matter what their orientation is if all you plan to do is look? Some of them look damn sexy, whatever their prefered partners are.


Knowing or suspecting that the model is gay is not the same for a chick.

At least not this chick.

One of my best friends in college was gay. This was at a point where it was becoming more accepted, but certainly not acceptible.

He and I would check out guys together. He was always jealous that my gaydar was better than his.

But, in viewing the photos of males who would be unattainable anyway, the idea that the most I'd be able to do with one of 'em if I DID get him would be have an nice pal discussion about something cools the fires.
Roosta • Nov 18, 2004 8:28 am
For a ton of variety, you could do worse than http://www.thehun.com
Cyber Wolf • Nov 18, 2004 5:57 pm
wolf wrote:
Knowing or suspecting that the model is gay is not the same for a chick.
At least not this chick.


Again, to each her own.

This chick sees it in the same way as how someone can be beautiful on the outside but downright ugly on the inside. This is why one should never decide on their soulmate based on looks alone. If all I wanted was to look at the outside, no problem. Besides (all photo captions aside) I never understood how someone could look at a nude man posing alone and 'know' he was gay. Or is it the fact that he has no reservations about letting potentially the world see his goods that makes him gay?

Anyway, I've got a bias. All of the gay men I know are flat out sexy. I've never actually met and made aquaintances/friends with a not-cute gay man though I know they exist. Funny how that happens.
jinx • Nov 18, 2004 6:37 pm
Cyber Wolf wrote:
Again, to each her own.

This chick sees it in the same way as how someone can be beautiful on the outside but downright ugly on the inside. This is why one should never decide on their soulmate based on looks alone. If all I wanted was to look at the outside, no problem. Besides (all photo captions aside) I never understood how someone could look at a nude man posing alone and 'know' he was gay. Or is it the fact that he has no reservations about letting potentially the world see his goods that makes him gay?

"Sexy" is in the mind to me. A gay man might be extremely attractive but he's none of the things that I find sexy. And I can tell that by looking at him pose pretty for the camera... with or without visable goods.
Cyber Wolf • Nov 18, 2004 9:18 pm
*shrug* Ah well. The pics are, for the most part, easy on the eyes. That's all. Can't expect everyone to like them too.
jinx • Nov 18, 2004 9:24 pm
Cyber Wolf wrote:
*shrug* Ah well. The pics are, for the most part, easy on the eyes. That's all. Can't expect everyone to like them too.

I hope you don't think I was suggesting you shouldn't have posted them... because I wasn't. I was just commenting.
zippyt • Nov 19, 2004 8:38 pm
ok you star wars fans her is some thing different ,
http://www.cic-celebs.omegawebhosting.com/swcover.htm
wolf • Nov 20, 2004 1:27 am
That is just wrong, but it is very well done.
Dude111 • Oct 12, 2020 3:29 am
Elspode wrote:
Well, I have two things to say about this:

1) The thread title is a definite case of truth in advertising.
2) This is definitely the correct forum for this thread.
And it is a good site also :)


alphageek31337 wrote:
http://www.p-bot.com (movies....yeah)
Heh very nice!