New smilies available

Undertoad • Nov 24, 2003 1:40 pm
In my effort to occasionally do something solely for the Cellar, to show that I truly do things other than post on it, I have added a handful of new graphical smilies.

I discourage overuse.

:boxers:

:censored:

:typing:

:doit:

:drunk:

:flipbird:

:joint:

:king:

:lovers:

:joylove:

:worried:
Undertoad • Nov 24, 2003 1:45 pm
Also, except for the sex one, all smilies here are from the same "universe" and not infected with different styled smilies from Yahoo and elsewhere.

They do represent a racially integrated smilie community.
richlevy • Nov 24, 2003 11:31 pm
:king: Hail to the King, baby!
xoxoxoBruce • Nov 25, 2003 12:12 am
In my effort to occasionally do something solely for the Cellar, to show that I truly do things other than post on it, snip
[SIZE=3]AND PAY FOR IT.[/SIZE] :beer:
SteveDallas • Nov 25, 2003 10:16 am
In light of current events, I think we all need to insist that the gender(s) involved in this one :lovers: and this one :doit: be clarified so we will be able to know exactly what kind of perversion(s) we're dealing with. Image
Undertoad • Nov 25, 2003 10:52 am
wolf pointed it out elsewhere but I forgot to mention that I also added

:band:

I think the person that did this drew the guitar but actually used a scanned copy of an actual bass.
ladysycamore • Nov 25, 2003 4:03 pm
:flipbird: Tee hee!
:joint: oh hell yeah!
Bitman • Nov 26, 2003 5:04 am
Very weird, I just looked through those for another post. But I think the :band: should be broken into four images, so (l)users can pick just one instrument. C'mon Undertony, get to it, that's what we're paying you for!

Oh wait, I'm a leech. Nevermind.
xoxoxoBruce • Nov 26, 2003 6:18 am
WHAT!?!? Break up the band? Noooo:eek:
SteveDallas • Nov 26, 2003 9:28 am
I was just gonna complain about the lack of a clarinet.
slang • Nov 26, 2003 11:53 am
Originally posted by Undertoad
I discourage overuse.


Thank you for the smileys, Mr Toad.

Overuse would be? Two smileys in a single post? Two consecutive posts with smileys? Two characters using two smileys in two consecutive post?

What would be the general guidelines? Should I expect to recieve several wiseass PMs when I use them per my judgement (like usual)?

Is there a Supreme Court precedent or cautionary tale that can be used as reference?

They certainly are cool but I'll be holding off using them before I know what the rules are.


wolf • Nov 26, 2003 11:18 pm
Just so you can break 'em, right?
slang • Nov 26, 2003 11:32 pm
You know me sooo well. :)
wolf • Nov 26, 2003 11:34 pm
True. :lovers:
lumberjim • Nov 27, 2003 2:45 am
Originally posted by Undertoad

I discourage overuse.


unless you're bruce who has demonstrated a pattern of using at least one :emot: with every post.

I imagine it is a need as real as eating and breathig for him by now, and to limit their use is to limit bruce's art. I don't think he'd survive for very long.

- a concerned cellizen.
adny • Nov 30, 2003 5:34 pm
The fourth one down is by far the best. :)
Pie • Nov 30, 2003 8:18 pm
Originally posted by wolf
True. :lovers:


Fer gossake, get a room!

Heh.

- Pie