Its About Time...

Beestie • Nov 14, 2003 8:28 am

Hmmmmmm...

Best I can tell they aren't sorry they ate the pilgrims, they are sorry that they are paying the price for eating the pilgrims.

More like an unsuccessful probation hearing, really. ;)

FileNotFound • Nov 14, 2003 9:16 am

In 1993, villagers presented the Methodist Church of Fiji with Baker's boots — which cannibals tried unsuccessfully to cook and eat.

Thats the funniest thing I read all week.

I don't know what the big deal is...I'd have eaten the piligrims myself had I been given the chance.

I mean why not? They're peacefuly living on their island, minding thier own business. Then all of a sudden this Rev. Baker shows up, and starts trying to convert them. Damn right they should eat him. If more Rev. got eaten the world as we know it would be a nicer place.

preacherswife2u • Nov 30, 2003 12:16 pm

If more Rev. got eaten the world as we know it would be a nicer place.

:eek:

slang • Nov 30, 2003 12:23 pm

Originally posted by FileNotFound
.....would be a nicer place.*

* - Please dont be offended by FNF's attempt to be anti-organized-religion'ish and leave the forum

slang • Nov 30, 2003 12:26 pm

Originally posted by slang
..... leave the forum**

** - we need some opposing viewpoints here to balance the ongoing commentary, PW2U

slang • Nov 30, 2003 12:28 pm

Originally posted by slang
....we need some opposing viewpoints here***

*** - In my opinion

preacherswife2u • Nov 30, 2003 12:30 pm

I'm just thinkin'...he'll be a little tough. He's been training for a marathon. Dale's might help...

That's me... Mrs. Opposing View Point. Relatives wore me out this past week.

:rolleyes:

preacherswife2u • Nov 30, 2003 12:31 pm

Hence my new sig tag

Torrere • Nov 30, 2003 12:40 pm

Originally posted by slang

*** - In my opinion†

† I disagree. Wait! What am I disagreeing about?

Oh! Right. FNF gave a valid, and nicely put opinion. It's a familiar sentiment delivered in an amusing and timely manner. It needn't be the first dentation for a flamefest.

slang • Nov 30, 2003 12:52 pm

Originally posted by Torrere
Oh! Right. FNF gave a valid, and nicely put opinion. It's a familiar sentiment delivered in an amusing and timely manner. It needn't be the first dentation for a flamefest.

1) I am not challenging the validity of the opinion.

2) It is a familiar sentiment that seems to resonate with the majority here, without an effective opposing perspective.

3) The comment is amusing and presented without vulgarities or personal, cutting or combative references.

4) Really Torr.....this? the first dentation for a flamefest?

quzah • Dec 2, 2003 7:58 am

Originally posted by preacherswife2u
Hence my new sig tag

Quoted from a post with no sig. It is to laugh.

Quzah.

Whit • Dec 2, 2003 11:46 am

      She meant user title. Oh well. Hey Slang, if you want an opposing viewpoint why don't you play the devil's advocate, so to speak?