I knew I should have stuck with the skiing..

ndetroit • Oct 10, 2003 5:06 pm
Image

awesome image, eh?

was going to post this here to see if our experts could figure out if it was real, or a fake.... (I thought it looked a little too sharp to me)

but then I got off my lazy ass, and found the actual URL of the guy who took it:

http://www.surfshooter.com/DolphinInfo.html


pretty cool, eh? ;)
LUVBUGZ • Oct 10, 2003 6:01 pm
Originally posted by ndetroit
awesome image, eh?

was going to post this here to see if our experts could figure out if it was real, or a fake.... (I thought it looked a little too sharp to me)

but then I got off my lazy ass, and found the actual URL of the guy who took it:

http://www.surfshooter.com/DolphinInfo.html


pretty cool, eh? ;)
Yeah, we've already had this discussion:rolleyes: . See "Surf's Up" thread in Quality Images. Of course I'm the only idiot who still thinks it's a shark, but heaven forbid I contradict snopes.com:p , or the guy who took the friggin pic because he would never try to pull anybody's leg:rolleyes: .
xoxoxoBruce • Oct 10, 2003 7:03 pm
I still think the tail looks vertical.:confused:
dave • Oct 10, 2003 7:41 pm
Oh my GOD THIS HAS BEEN BEATEN TO DEATH. FOR THE LOVE OF CHRIST, IT IS A FUCKING DOLPHIN! IT HAS BEEN THOROUGHLY DEBUNKED. GIVE IT UP! LIKE THE DOLPHIN COULDN'T FUCKING TWIST ITS TAIL SOME! LIKE IT CAN'T BE AT A GODDAMN FUNNY ANGLE! HOLY CHRIST! IT IS NOT A FUCKING SHARK!
Griff • Oct 10, 2003 8:54 pm
Originally posted by dave
Oh my GOD THIS HAS BEEN BEATEN TO DEATH. FOR THE LOVE OF CHRIST, IT IS A FUCKING DOLPHIN! IT HAS BEEN THOROUGHLY DEBUNKED. GIVE IT UP! LIKE THE DOLPHIN COULDN'T FUCKING TWIST ITS TAIL SOME! LIKE IT CAN'T BE AT A GODDAMN FUNNY ANGLE! HOLY CHRIST! IT IS NOT A FUCKING SHARK!


Shhhhish don't stare at the crazy man kids. If you don't look him in the eye he won't flip out on you.
zippyt • Oct 10, 2003 9:47 pm
Damn Dave has a short fuse ,, hell lets mess with him .
I'll start ,
hey Dave [SIZE=4]YO MOMMA !!!!![/SIZE]
LUVBUGZ • Oct 10, 2003 10:58 pm
Originally posted by dave
Oh my GOD THIS HAS BEEN BEATEN TO DEATH. FOR THE LOVE OF CHRIST, IT IS A FUCKING DOLPHIN! IT HAS BEEN THOROUGHLY DEBUNKED. GIVE IT UP! LIKE THE DOLPHIN COULDN'T FUCKING TWIST ITS TAIL SOME! LIKE IT CAN'T BE AT A GODDAMN FUNNY ANGLE! HOLY CHRIST! IT IS NOT A FUCKING SHARK!
God I love fuckin' with Dave, he's soooooo excitable:p :p :p
wolf • Oct 10, 2003 11:11 pm
If YOU are close enough to jerk his chain, HE is close enough to rip your throat out.
xoxoxoBruce • Oct 10, 2003 11:15 pm
Yeah, he's a real tiger.:D
juju • Oct 11, 2003 1:30 am
Yes, snopes.com is irrefutable. :)
LUVBUGZ • Oct 11, 2003 11:28 pm
Originally posted by wolf
If YOU are close enough to jerk his chain, HE is close enough to rip your throat out.
OOHH!! Threat or Promise? Either way I can't wait. Nothing like looking down the barrel of a 44 Magnum. Come on baby make my friggin'day.
LUVBUGZ • Oct 11, 2003 11:29 pm
Originally posted by juju
Yes, snopes.com is irrefutable. :)
Says who?????
xoxoxoBruce • Oct 11, 2003 11:35 pm
Why Snopes, of course.:D
juju • Oct 12, 2003 1:56 am
Uhh.. it just IS! Are you sure you're on the internet? ::suspicious look::
dave • Oct 12, 2003 3:57 am
Snopes is irrefutable because they don't post an opinion on something until they have done enough research that said opinion is fact. Fact is irrefutable.
slang • Oct 12, 2003 4:04 am
Originally posted by dave
Fact is irrefutable.


That depends on how Ju interprets it. :D
ndetroit • Oct 12, 2003 1:26 pm
doh..

didn't realize we'd already seen this one, and that it would get dave so riled up... ...


for what it's worth, I don't think it's 100% proof that it's not a shark... the original pic and the followup could have been taken hours apart for all we know... and the original pic could have distored the dorsal fin and fluke through the water's refraction (reflection?)


oh well.
LUVBUGZ • Oct 12, 2003 1:32 pm
Originally posted by ndetroit
doh..

didn't realize we'd already seen this one, and that it would get dave so riled up... ...


for what it's worth, I don't think it's 100% proof that it's not a shark... the original pic and the followup could have been taken hours apart for all we know...
Well put:) . Thank you very much. See Dave, I'm NOT the only one:p .
xoxoxoBruce • Oct 12, 2003 4:17 pm
Originally posted by dave
Snopes is irrefutable because they don't post an opinion on something until they have done enough research that said opinion is fact. Fact is irrefutable.

Plus the fact so many people use Snopes to check out stuff, if they made a mistake someone would be on them right away.:)
zippyt • Oct 13, 2003 8:41 pm
This is where the fire ball came from !!!!!