UT, I warned you about dogs catching treats

Now we must turn the tables:

<img src="http://www.newzucanuze.com/images/Dog/Pussy90.jpg">
<img src="http://www.newzucanuze.com/images/Dog/Pussy91.jpg">
<img src="http://www.newzucanuze.com/images/Dog/Pussy92.jpg">
<img src="http://www.newzucanuze.com/images/Dog/Pussy94.jpg">
<img src="http://www.newzucanuze.com/images/Dog/Pussy95.jpg">
<img src="http://www.newzucanuze.com/images/Dog/Pussy96.jpg">
<img src="http://www.newzucanuze.com/images/Dog/Pussy97.jpg">
<img src="http://www.newzucanuze.com/images/Dog/Pussy98.jpg">
<img src="http://www.newzucanuze.com/images/Dog/Pussy99.jpg">

Where's that big flash when I need it?

Every picture tells a story...

<img src="http://www.newzucanuze.com/images/Dog/Best1.jpg">

I see the treats but what's that got to do with dogs?;)

Turning the tables, it's treats catching dogs. And so it is.

You can get booted off a lot of P2P hubs with pictures like that.....;)

Does your camera have adjustable light sensitivity and white balance? If it does, you may find you need that flash less than you think.

All my pix are looking washed out since last week when I spilled beer on my camera. Nikon 995. Subconciously I wanted to replace it anyway, I think.

I'm thinking digital SLR. Canon has a 6-megapixel model out that looks good ($1500 body only :eek:). Plus lenses of course.

But if I'm gonna turn pro anyway... any suggestions will be greatly appreciated.

Oh, I have a 995 too. A great camera. Play with setting the ISO sensitivity to 400 or even 800. And the manual white balance is your friend. The problem with flash (at least a simple on-camera flash like the 995 has) is that you illuminate one area of your subject and leave the rest of the pic dark. You can also use the slow flah sync setting to correct this.

The Canon 10D is gettin a lot of play on the astrophotography list I'm on but I don't know much about it. Still... if you can wait a few months the price will come down more. Can the 995 be salvaged at all?

This is why I love the Cellar. This must be the only place on the entire internet where photos of tits and dogs yields conversation about ISO, white balance and astrophotography. Bravo!

Well I don't have much to say about tits and dogs that hasn't already been said. But, my hope is that by offering what meager photography advice is at my disposal, I can enable the future (near future, hopefully) production of even more and even higher quality tit photos.

Does that make you feel better, 99? :angel: (May I call you 99?[/obscure reference to "Get Smart"])

This is the Internet, and such photos are widely available. These are better cos there's an implied story behind them which NBN is not telling.

there's an implied story behind them which NBN is not telling.

You mean the dogs got locked out of the room!:eek:

That's a good point, UT. I enjoy seeing the "You are there" kind of pics--"I was actually here and walked up and talked to this person"--more than just random stuff on the net which, as you say, is as common as dandelions.

There are four million stories in the Naked City, but most will never be told:

<img src="http://www.newzucanuze.com/images/Popsicle.jpg">

Now for something different, I hope you like this one:

<img src="http://www.newzucanuze.com/images/Fishing.jpg">

Here is a pic of my little monster, Junior.

Now that looks like a happy dog!:thumb:

Junior is at his happiest when he's chasing something (rabbits, kids on bikes/skates, cars etc) or shredding the Sunday paper or just chewing on a handy stuffed animal. He also likes to tug on anything soft.

You can't see in that shot, but he has the whitest teeth of any dog I've ever seen. They look like the Osmonds' teeth! Really!

Dagney and I will try to get his to show you but when he breaks out his chompers, he usually eats whatever is in front of him. ;)

Brian