Journalistic Lack of Integrity

wolf • May 11, 2003 11:11 pm
I found it interesting to read this article which describes an apology that was issued by The New York Times regarding stories they printed that appear not to be true. There's a bit of a scandal involved beyond the usual, because the young man involved was fast tracked to become a full reporter, and was apparently promoted over several more experienced coworkers.

What makes this more interesting is that tonight's Sixty Minutes ran a segment on an almost identical situation, in which a reporter for, in this case, New Republic along with several other print magazines, did much the same thing — made up stories, quotes, sources.

Is this a common practice in journalism? or has it become such?
Bitmap • May 12, 2003 12:53 am
I wouldn't put it past journalists to write "Yellow Journalism" They've been doing it for a long time. Only now in the digital age it is easier for it to turn into truth.
xoxoxoBruce • May 12, 2003 11:21 pm
Ever since news became a business rather than a service, the "sensationalism sells" credo has become more pervasive.
Is there anyone that didn't know that?
elSicomoro • May 12, 2003 11:28 pm
Originally posted by xoxoxoBruce
Is there anyone that didn't know that?


*raises hand* Sorry, I'm a little slow.
Uryoces • May 13, 2003 12:32 am
Originally posted by xoxoxoBruce
Ever since news became a business rather than a service, the "sensationalism sells" credo has become more pervasive.
Is there anyone that didn't know that?
Yeah, exactly. Some people accuse the press of liberal bias, others of conservative bias, but I think the truth is it's just sensationalist.
elSicomoro • May 13, 2003 1:03 am
If there were no sensationalist edge to news, none of us would watch it. It'd be boring.
wolf • May 13, 2003 1:27 am
My mother often makes a complaint on seeing the first 5 minutes of the local newscast "murder, murder, armed robbery, rape, and dead body, cause unknown ... isn't there any pleasant news?"

"Yes mom, but that's on in the five minutes after the weather. Nobody would watch the fluffy kitty news. That would be boring."
Uryoces • May 13, 2003 4:07 am
Syc my friend, that is why I do not watch it. Or take the paper.

Hell, as a side note, I didn't even know there is going to be some kind of bio-terror drill here in Seattle.
Skunks • May 13, 2003 4:32 am
Years ago, we stopped getting the paper. At the time, we didn't have the intarweb, didn't have cable, and could only get one or two channels on TV; not that we really bothered to watch, much.

My main complaint was not getting to read new comics daily. Now, eh. I only watch network news when I'm exceedingly bored, just about never read news websites, and still don't get the paper.

I don't really think I'm missing much; comics can be read easier and with greater enjoyment online, and anything of significance (or amusement) I'll hear about eventually, one way or another.
Whit • May 13, 2003 10:44 am
      I still think the Daily Show is the best news program on TV...
Cam • May 13, 2003 4:05 pm
Originally posted by Whit
      I still think the Daily Show is the best news program on TV...



The sad thing is I agree with you, and can say that without an ounce of sarcasm
xoxoxoBruce • May 14, 2003 8:16 am
Nobody would watch the fluffy kitty news.

The closest I've found to an exception is the CBS news on Sunday mornings. It's mostly fluffy kitty with a few hard items but presented in interesting manner. Basicly no yelling and no hypeing, just reporting.
wolf • May 14, 2003 11:11 am
Ahhhh ... but is that news? CBS Sunday Morning is 60 Minutes' kinder, gentler cousin, ending with the sounds of birds rather than the last ticks of the stopwatch. It's a magazine show, not 'this just in' news programming.

(Not that I'm actually awake that early on a Sunday Morning, but I really liked it better when Charles Kuralt was the host.)
Whit • May 14, 2003 1:17 pm
     Being awake early on a sunday morning??? I'm not sure that what's happening in the world is that important. Maybe when Radar's Revolution comes... Nah, I'd rather sleep in. It'll still be news a few hours later.
xoxoxoBruce • May 14, 2003 4:00 pm
Ahhhh ... but is that news?

Of course. It's the heart and soul of fluffy kitty news. Something you don't know, wouldn't affect you if you never found out but interesting anyway.
I must admit Im probably not a good judge, because I'm interested in damn near everything (LOL). But it is nice to watch something that's interesting and doesn't piss me off, like most hard news/sensationalist broadcasts.
ScottSolomon • May 14, 2003 4:04 pm
I agree with Whit.

The Daily Show is the only thing that keeps me from going off the deep end.
xoxoxoBruce • May 14, 2003 4:16 pm
The Daily Show is the only thing that keeps me from going off the deep end.
It didn't work. C'mon Scott you know you're off the deep end! That doesn't mean I think you're wrong. You usually make valid points but your rabidity scares the pets.:D
ScottSolomon • May 14, 2003 4:38 pm
I don't know if I should be offended or elated about your comment - so I will be indifferent.


:)
xoxoxoBruce • May 14, 2003 4:49 pm
the intelligent are full of doubt.
I don't know if I should be offended or elated about your comment

There you go.:D
wolf • May 15, 2003 2:20 am
Scott has nothing to worry about at this point. (he doesn't live in my jurisdiction). ;)