Original "this is your brain on drugs" egg-smashing actress stars in new PSA

Undertoad • Apr 21, 2017 8:30 am
[YOUTUBE]AKXN6Vdr3g0[/YOUTUBE]
footfootfoot • Apr 21, 2017 12:06 pm
The original ad extended cut.

[YOUTUBE]LQsQbuNWmnE[/YOUTUBE]
sexobon • Apr 22, 2017 9:08 am
Undertoad;987243 wrote:
[SIZE="1"]Original "this is your brain on drugs" egg-smashing actress stars in new PSA________ [/SIZE]

Is she, like, saying that you can't have a war on drugs even if there is a smoking gun? Wow man, this is a game changer.
tw • Apr 23, 2017 9:45 am
sexobon;987304 wrote:
Is she, like, saying that you can't have a war on drugs even if there is a smoking gun? Wow man, this is a game changer.


When was the last time a heroine needle fired a smoking gun? When was the last fire a joint killed someone else in the street? No smoking gun means the war was lost before it even started - another Mission Accomplished.
BigV • Apr 23, 2017 10:11 am
Talk about high...
sexobon • Apr 23, 2017 10:15 am
What about the people who steal, batter, and kill for the money to support their drug habits [rhetorical]? Since when have you ever limited smoking guns to inanimate objects before [rhetorical]?

A "war on drugs" is directed at people. No one is trying to put a joint in the joint. Even a child can figure out that whether a war is well prosecuted; or, poorly prosecuted, is not the rationale for it. It's sad enough that you've been developmentally impaired all your life; but, now you've gotten senile on top of it. Keep up the fine comedic entertainment you contrarian you. ;)
tw • Apr 23, 2017 3:41 pm
sexobon;987354 wrote:
A "war on drugs" is directed at people.


So there is no smoking gun. The war is bogus - based in lies - just like Mission Accomplished and Nam.
sexobon • Apr 23, 2017 3:56 pm
Bogus is as tw does. Smoking guns are required for war like smoking cigarettes are required for good health.
tw • Apr 23, 2017 5:52 pm
sexobon;987367 wrote:
Bogus is as tw does. Smoking guns are required for war like smoking cigarettes are required for good health.

In the tradition of extremists (ie O'Reilly) - more cheapshots. No knowledge. Not even a shred of humor. Plenty of wasted bandwidth.
sexobon • Apr 23, 2017 6:06 pm
In the tradition of losers like Hillary - more whining. No integrity. Hallmark detachment from reality. Maladjusted rumination.
tw • Apr 25, 2017 1:04 am
sexobon;987371 wrote:
In the tradition of losers like Hillary -

So you only do what wacko extremists understand - insult poeple. Promote hate. Full the world with your emotions - like an adult who is still a child. In the tradition of great cheapshot artists such as Ann Coulter and Bill O'Reilly.

At least when Howard Stern does it, it is for comedy. You do know what comedy is - right? Maybe get your brain off drugs. Cheapshot artists are classic losers.
sexobon • Apr 25, 2017 6:33 am
^More loser talk.^

Ah yes, the developmentally impaired tw, less than a child.