Intercourse Résumé

While reading a review of the book, "Letters to Véra, by Vladimir Nabokov", I came across...

"Before their marriage in 1925, Vladimir, following a tradition among Russian litterateurs, handed over an intercourse résumé. Here’s everybody. It contained twenty-eight names."

The idea of handing her an intercourse résumé blows my mind. I suppose in 1925 anywhere she was presumed to be a virgin, so it would not be an exchange. No, it would only be him submitting... yeah, submitting is the right word.

Now that we know and admit that women not only fart, they fuck, I wonder if this would be wise today? A prenuptial exchange of lists.
Would it be marked 1st base, 2nd base, third base, oral only, buttplay, threesome(mmf, ffm, mmm, fff), close relatives, farm animals...

And there I was expecting a guide to a small town in Pennsylvania.

I hardly ever get there, usually have to settle for Bird-In-Hand. ;)

Would one be expected to provide an explanation for any gaps in activity?

Ouch.

DanaC;952349 wrote:

Would one be expected to provide an explanation for any gaps in activity?

List those as periods of employment citing client confidentiality.

There are no gaps in the history, only gaps in partners. ;)

DanaC;952349 wrote:

Would one be expected to provide an explanation for any gaps in activity?

Period of self-employment. ;-)

I would never care if the number was high, but it would have helped me in several cases to know the number was low. It would have reminded me to put on the emotional kidgloves.

Sheldonrs;952404 wrote:

Period of self-employment. ;-)

Period of self-enjoyment.


FTFY

:jig:

I've known a couple guys that didn't actually know the names of all their prior conquests, and in fact didn't even know how many they'd been with. I wonder what their list would look like? :eek:

No way could I list them. I'd like to think I'd know their names when I saw them, though. I also would like to think I would recognize them all. I mean the list ain't that long. No idea of my number of partners. Something less than Gene Simmons and Wilt Chamberlain for sure.