from Washington Post on 8 Apr 2003
Ruling Backs Anti-Spam Activist
Judge Says Web Site Doesn't Have to Be Taken Down
An Internet site that provides personal information about an alleged purveyor of mass e-mail is not harassment and does not need to be removed, a Maryland district court judge ruled yesterday.
Francis Uy, a tech specialist at Johns Hopkins University, posted the site to expose the activities of George A. Moore Jr., owner of Maryland Internet Marketing Inc. in Linthicum. Moore, whose company sells nutritional weight-loss products, such as Fat-N-Emy and Extreme Colon Cleanser, has been identified by spam-tracking
Victims of spammer:
http://www.getspecific.com/Region/USA/States/MD.htm
http://ecommerce.internet.com/news/news/article/0,,10375_1569901,00.html
What he is about:
http://mail.spamcon.org/pipermail/suespammers/2003-January/003256.html
Websites using that name:
http://www.advantageim.com/services/internetmarketing.html
[URL]http://www.impactbusiness.com/marketing.htm
Just some records on George A Moore Jr and Maryland Internet Marketing:
http://www.spamhaus.org/sbl/sbl.lasso?query=SBL8058
http://www.spamhaus.org/sbl/sbl.lasso?query=SBL7478
http://www.spamhaus.org/sbl/sbl.lasso?query=SBL6680
http://www.spamhaus.org/sbl/sbl.lasso?query=SBL6509The Linthicum MD spammer is alledged to sell pirated Norton software. Another in IL is subject to court action according the CNN:
from "FTC tries to shut down spam e-mail operation":
The Federal Trade Commission said Thursday that after receiving about 46,000 complaints it had asked a federal judge to halt the operation until there can be a trial. It is the first FTC case involving spam with deceptive subject lines, the agency said.
"When consumers opened the e-mail messages, they were immediately subjected to sexually explicit solicitations," the FTC said. "Because of the deceptive subject lines, consumers had no reason to expect to see such material."
Children may have been exposed to the pornographic e-mail, the agency said.
HEY! That's right next door...I live in the next town over.
Talk about your small world!
And yes, I have seen these deceptive SPAMS too. I delete them just like all the other SPAM I get
Brian
Originaly posted by TW:
The companies America Online, Microsoft and Yahoo are calling for technical changes in the way e-mail is passed around cyberspace to make it easier to determine who really sent it and what it is about.
I don't think i want those companies knowing what's in my e-mail and what it's about. If they put these "technical changes" in to e-mail what's going to stop them from puting them in our every day mail?
Where does it say anywhere that they will access the contents of your E-mail?
In the meantime, with spam sometimes approaching nearly 50 spams every day (this on my protected e-mail addresses), then spam has cause me to delete necessary messages. Spam filters also have delete some non-spam e-mail. However, VA has recently passed a law to make spam illegal.
Currently, spam has jumped from about20% of all e-mails in June of last year, to about 30+% in July, and is now about 45% of all e-mail traffic.